Karlik A.E., Krechko S.A., Platonov V.V.Published in:
Russian Journal of Labor Economics
– Volume 5, Number 2 (April-June 2018)

JEL classification: M50, O31, O32, O33

Keywords: information and communication technologies, innovative benchmarking, innovative development, key performance indicators, organizational and managerial innovations, personnel management system, personnel metrics


Share:

Abstract:

The article outlines methodological approaches to utilization of modern tools for improving the personnel management system of an innovative enterprise. The ability of personnel to perceive and use new knowledge for the implementation of innovative activities largely determine the innovative capabilities of enterprises and, first of all, organizational and managerial innovations. Understanding this aspect in personnel management leads to the need to assess the knowledge, skills and competencies of the staff, as well as the identification of the needs for its development. In this connection, the article analyzes the role of organizational and managerial innovations in the innovative development of an industrial enterprise, which form the ability to create and maintain organizational mechanisms for the distribution and reproduction of resources for the formation and retention of competitive advantages. An analysis is made of the relationship between the implementation of information and communication technologies (ICT) and management. ICT contributes to innovation due to the fact that many aspects of the innovation process are moderators. However, the possession of ICT in itself is not a source of competitive advantage. The formation of an innovative effect is facilitated by the combination of organizational assets and skills in application to the developed technologies. Approaches to the choice of areas for personnel development for organizational and managerial innovations based on staff benchmarking are evaluated. Features of innovative benchmarking and its use for providing organizational and managerial innovations are considered. Methodical recommendations for developing metrics for personnel benchmarking based on modern management concepts are proposed. The system of metrics for assessing the achievement of the goal of organizational and managerial innovation is presented - the development of information competencies of personnel.

---

References:
Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantageJournal of Management. Retrieved from https://business.illinois.edu/josephm/BA545_Fall%202013/Barney%20(1991).pdf
Bekker G. (2003). Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ekonomicheskiy podkhod [Human behavior: the economic approach] M.: GU VShE. (in Russian).
Brynjolfsson E., Hitt Lorin M. (2000). Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance Journal of Economic Perspectives. 14 (4). 23-48. doi: 10.1257/jep.14.4.23.
Cohen Wesley M.; Levinthal Daniel A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation Administrative Science QuarterlyTechnology, Organizations, and Innovation. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0001-8392%28199003%2935%3A1%3C128%3AACANPO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-5
Damanpour F., Walker R.M., Avellaneda C.N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations Journal of Management Studies. (46(4)). 650-675. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x.
Eliseeva I.I., Platonov V.V. (2014). Dinamicheskiy potentsial - nedostayuschee zveno v issledovanii innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti [Dynamic Capacity is the Missing Link in the Study of Innovation Activity]. Finance and business. (4). 102-110. (in Russian).
Helfat E., Peteraf M. A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles Constance Strategic Management Journal. (24). 997-1010. doi: 10.1002/smj.332.
Hengst M., Sol H.G. The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Interorganizational CoordinationInform.nu. Retrieved from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol4/v4n4p129-138.pdf
Karlik A. E., Platonov V.V. (2013). Sovremennye napravleniya issledovaniya ekonomiki predpriyatiya i upravleniya innovatsiyami [Modern trends in the study of enterprise economics and innovation management] SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGEU. (in Russian).
Karlik A.E., Platonov V.V. (2015). Organizatsionno-upravlencheskie innovatsii: rezerv povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti Rossiyskoy promyshlennosti [Organizational and management innovation as a hidden driver of boosting the competitiveness of the russian industry]. The Economic Revival of Russia. (3(45)). 34-44. (in Russian).
McCormack K.P., Johnson W.C. Business process orientation – Gaining the e-business competitive advantageFlorida: St. Lucie Press. Retrieved from http://bookfi.net/book/1194102
Nelson R., Phelps E. Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growthAmerican Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings. Retrieved from http://federation.ens.fr/wheberg/parischoeco/formation/fcses/_boitdocu/0607s1_lect02_a.pdf
Nelson Richard R., Winter Sidney G. Evolutionary Theorizing in EconomicsJournal of Economic Perspectives. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28196603%2956%3A1%2F2%3C69%3AIIHTDA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E
Oslo Manual The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (rus)Oecd.org. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/2367580.pdf
Pelisson A., Smith D. These tech companies make the most revenue per employeeBusiness insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/tech-companies-revenue-employee-2017-8
Platonov V.V. (2006). Uchet investirovaniya v nematerialnye aktivy kak sredstvo ustraneniya razryva mezhdu strategiey i byudzhetom predpriyatiya [Accounting for investing in intangible assets as a means of bridging the gap between a company's strategy and budget]. Finance and business. (4). 80-85. (in Russian).
Platonov V.V. (2007). «Paradoks Solou» dvadtsat let spustya ili ob issledovanii vliyaniya innovatsiy v informatsionnyh tekhnologiyakh na rost proizvoditelnosti ["The Solow Paradox" twenty years later, or a study of the impact of innovation in information technology on productivity growth]. Finance and business. (3). 28-39. (in Russian).
Prakhalad S.K., Khamel G. (2003). Klyuchevaya kompetentsiya korporatsii [Core competence of the corporation]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. 8 (3(24)). 18-41. (in Russian).
Rostek K. (2014). The Mutual Benchmarking Method For Smes’ Competitive Strategy Development Foundations of Management. 5 (2). doi: 10.2478/fman-2014-0015.
Stapenhurst T. (2009). The Benchmarking Book: A How-to-Guide to Best Practice for Managers and Practitioners Elsevier Ltd.
Søilen K. S., Tontini G. (2013). Knowledge Management Systems and Human Resource Management Policies for Innovation Benchmarking: a Study of ST Ericsson International Journal of Innovation Science. (5(3)). 159-172. doi: 10.1260/1757-2223.5.3.159.
Teece D.J., Pisano G.,Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic managementStrategic Management Journal. Retrieved from https://business.illinois.edu/josephm/BA545_Fall%202013/Teece,%20Pisano%20and%20Shuen%20%281997%29.pdf
Бизнес-модель по руководству и управлению ИТ на предприятии Руководство по использованиюIsaca. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://www.isaca.org/COBITuse
Рейтинг по производительности труда и фонду зарплатыВедомости. Retrieved from https://www.vedomosti.ru/management/articles/2017/12/05/744136-trudyatsya-zarabativayut