Litvinyuk A.A., Loginova A.V., Kuzub E.V.Published in:
Leadership and Management
– Volume 6, Number 3 (August-September 2019)

JEL classification: I23, M11, M21, M50

Keywords: feminization, gender, high school, high technology, human resources, motivational profile, science


Share:

Abstract:

The article presents the results of research related to the study of feminization of Russian science and higher education. The results have cast doubt on the effectiveness of Government policy in this area of activity as it directly or indirectly contributes to the reduction of the proportion of males in the core staff of research institutions. The main reasons for the feminization of scientific personnel are as follows: relatively low wages of scientists, a long time lag of professional career development; low social prestige of the profession and numerous reductions in the number of teaching staff and researchers in modern Russian scientific organizations and institutions of higher education. All this together leads to a decrease in the efficiency of research and the movement of staff interests from achieving results to the formation of a report on the work done.

---

References:
Bobkov V.N., Litvinyuk A.A. (2016). Rossiyskaya molodyozh na rynke truda: ekonomicheskaya aktivnost i problemy trudoustroystva [Russian youth in the labour market: economic activity and unemployment] M.: Izdatelstvo «OOO Rusayns». (in Russian).
Chelnokova A.V., Dorfman L.Ya. (2008). Gendernye aspekty kreativnosti [Gender aspects of creativity]. The Education and Science Journal. (7). 50-60. (in Russian).
Handley I.M., Brown E.R., Moss-Racusin C.A., Smith J.L. (2012). Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (112(43)). 13201-13206.
Kachalova Yu.N. (2013). Model muzhskikh i zhenskikh tipov s pozitsiy evolyutsionnoy psikhologii i klasternoy teorii soznaniya [The male and female model types from the standpoint of evolutionary psychology and the cluster theory of consciousness]. Chelovecheskiy faktor: sotsialnyy psikholog. (2(26)). 24-40. (in Russian).
Knobloch-Westerwick S., Glynn C.J., Huge M. (2013). The Matilda Effect in Science Communication: An Experiment on Gender Bias in Publication Quality Perceptions and Collaboration Interest Science Communication. 603-625.
Litvinyuk A.A. (2015). Organizatsionnoe povedenie [Organizational behavior] M.: Yurayt. (in Russian).
Litvinyuk A.A. i dr. (2009). Aktualnye problemy upravleniya personalom v rossiyskikh vysshikh uchebnyh zavedeniyakh [Actual problems of personnel management in Russian higher educational institutions] M.: Izdatelstvo Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo torgovo-ekonomicheskogo universiteta. (in Russian).
Litvinyuk A.A. i dr. (2015). Otchyot ob okazanii uslugi po provedeniyu kompleksnogo issledovaniya polozheniya molodyozhi na rynke truda goroda Moskvy [Report on the provision of services to conduct a comprehensive study of the situation of youth in the labour market of Moscow city] M.. (in Russian).
Litvinyuk A.A., Melnikov V.A., Kuzub E.V. (2019). O problemakh motivatsii innovatsionno-aktivnyh molodyh spetsialistov k trudoustroystvu v sfere nauki, vysokikh tekhnologiy i vysshego obrazovaniya [About problems of motivation of innovative and active young specialists to employment in the sphere of science, high technologies and higher education]. Creative economy. 13 (6). 1269-1278. (in Russian).
Litvinyuk A.A., Smirnova M.E., Shirvanov R.A. (2018). O metodike prognozirovaniya organizatsionnogo povedeniya personala organizatsii [The methodology of forecasting the organizational behaviour of the personnel of the organization]. Innovatsii v menedzhmente. (2(16)). 42-57. (in Russian).
Litvinyuk A.A., Zhigun L.A., Polevaya M.V., Kamneva E.V. (2018). Primenenie teorii motivatsionnogo kompleksa trudovoy deyatelnosti k analizu organizatsionnogo povedeniya prepodavateley vuza [Application of the theory of motivational complex of labor activity to the analysis of organizational behavior of university professors]. Creative economy. 12 (2). 215-226. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/ce.12.2.38817 .
Lukichyov P.M. (2018). Diskriminatsiya zhenschin na rynke truda i vozmozhnye puti resheniya problemy [Discrimination of women in the labor market and possible solutions]. Obrazovanie i nauka v Rossii i za rubezhom. (12(47)). 34-39. (in Russian).
Moss-Racusin C.A., Dovidio J.F., Brescoll V.L., Graham M.J., Handelsman J. (2012). Science faculty‘s subtle gender biases favor male students Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (109(41)). 16474-16479.
Solovey A.P. (2017). Sotsialnye i psikhologicheskie faktory postroeniya i realizatsii karery zhenschiny v nauke [Social and psychological factors of construction and implementation of career women in science]. Ustoychivoe razvitie nauki i obrazovaniya. (2). 64-70. (in Russian).
Zorya A.S. (2016). Demokraticheskaya etika nauchnogo soobschestva: gendernyy aspekt [Democratic ethics of the academic community: gender dimension] Intelligentsia, its civil position in the modern world. 93-99. (in Russian).
Ромах О.В., Слепцова А.О. Гендерный аспект феномена талантливой личностиАналитика культурологии. Retrieved August 19, 2019, from http://analiculturolog.ru/journal/archive/item/593-gender-aspects-of-the-phenomenon-talented-individuals.html