Saveleva E.A.Published in:
Russian Journal of Labor Economics
– Volume 5, Number 4 (October-December 2018)

JEL classification: J01, J28, J62, J80, M54

Keywords: digital economy, digital ecosystem, digital labor organization, digital society, Industry 4.0, labor, Work 4.0


Share:

Abstract:

The article is devoted to the development and justification of a new socio-technical concept - digital organization of labor. The content of the concept of "digital organization of labor" is introduced into scientific use and revealed. The features of its key areas are given, including: development and implementation of network forms of division and cooperation of labor; design of optimal labor processes and systems based on information and communication technologies (ICT); formation of rational labor mobility; development and implementation of sound rules and regulations in the field of digital labor; training of labor agents to work in the digital space; creation of balanced systems of remuneration, attraction and retention of labor agents. The methodological principles of digital organization of labor, as well as approaches to the study and solution of theoretical and practical issues of digital organization of labor are discussed.

---

References:
(2007). Ukreplenie potentsialnyh vozmozhnostey MOT po okazaniyu sodeystviya gosudarstvam-chlenam v dostizhenii tseley Organizatsii v kontekste globalizatsii: pyatyy punkt povestki dnya [Strengthening the capacity of ILO to assist member States in achieving the goals of the Organization in the context of globalization: fifth agenda item] Zheneva: Mezhdunarodnoe byuro truda. (in Russian).
(2011). Mezhdunarodnaya organizatsiya truda: konventsii, dokumenty, materialy [International labour organization: conventions, instruments, materials] M.: Delo i Servis. (in Russian).
(2019). World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work Washington: World Bank.
Adner R., Kapoor R. (2010). Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generation Strategic Management Journal. (31).
Badzho R., Sheresheva M.Yu. (2014). Setevoy podkhod v ekonomike i upravlenii: mezhdistsiplinarnyy kharakter [Network Approach in Economics and Management: the Interdisciplinary Nature]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika. (2). 3-21. (in Russian).
Doroshenko S.V., Shelomentsev A.G. (2017). Predprinimatelskaya ekosistema v sovremennyh sotsioekonomicheskikh issledovaniyakh [The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in the Contemporary Socio-Economic Studies]. Journal of Economic Theory. (4). 212-221. (in Russian).
Karaev A.K., Melnichuk M.V. (2013). Sovremennaya ekonomika: multidistsiplinarnyy podkhod [Modern Economics: Multidisciplinary Approach]. Biznes v zakone. (4). 93-97. (in Russian).
Konstantinova D.S. (2009). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskie osnovy mnogofunktsionalnogo soderzhaniya truda rabotnika [Organizational and economic bases of the multifunctional maintenance of work of the worker] Omsk: Omskiy gos. un-t im. F.M. Dostoevskogo. (in Russian).
Mariani M.M. (2007). Coopetition as an Emergent Strategy. Empirical Evidence from an Italian Consortium of Opera House International Studies. 37 (2).
Mercier-Laurent E. (2013). Innovation Ecosystems New York: Wiley.
Moore J.F. (1996). The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems New York.
Moore J.F. (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm The Antitrust Bulletin. 51 (1). 31-75.
Schwab K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution New York: Crown Business.
Shvab K. (2019). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya: [The fourth industrial revolution] M.: EKSMO. (in Russian).
Sobolevskaya A.A., Popov A.K. (2009). Postindustrialnaya revolyutsiya v sfere truda [The post-industrial revolution in the world of work] M.: IMEMO RAN. (in Russian).
Vilkhovchenko E.D. (2003). Postindustrialnye modeli truda: sotsioorganizatsionnyy progress na rubezhe XXI veka [Post-industrial models of labor: socio-organizational progress at the turn of the XXI century]. World Economy and International Relations. (3). 56-65. (in Russian).