Ekaterina DuizenPublished in:
Leadership and Management
– Volume 2, Number 1 (January-March, 2015)

JEL classification: D70, J24, M12

Keywords: expert evaluation, expert group, expertise, work team


Share:

Abstract:

The article discusses the efficiency of work methods of expert groups and methods for the formation thereof. The considered algorithm of expert evaluation allows to state that the formation of an expert group is a labor-intensive, complex and multi-staged process. At that, no unified regulations for the expert group work have been developed so far. To improve the efficiency of expert work it has been proposed to use the job candidate competence coefficient and the coefficient of the stability of his work. The considered approach enables to formalize the processes of collection, analysis and processing of expert opinions with subsequent translation of the obtained information into a form more convenient and practical. However, this method is not a substitute for the quantitative analysis, but rather a supplement to more precise methods.

---

References:
Alekseev, A.A. (2010). Formirovanie strategicheskogo podkhoda k upravleniyu na sovremennom promyshlennom predpriyatii s ispolzovaniem metodov ekspertnogo otsenivaniya i mnogomernogo statisticheskogo analiza. Sistemy i sredstva svyazi, televideniya i radioveschaniya, 1–2, 105–107.
Besedin, N.A., Nagaeva, G.A. (2008). Ispolzovanie metoda ekspertnogo otsenivaniya situatsiy pri podgotovke spetsialistov po finansam. Vіsnik Dnіpropetrovsykogo derzhavnogo agrarnogo unіversitetu, 1, 115–117.
Bukharin, S.V., Melnikov, A.V. (2011). Ekspertnaya otsenka finansovyh pokazateley likvidnosti i platezhesposobnosti. Konkurentosposobnost. Innovatsii. Finansy, 1, 74–79.
Gotovtseva, L.A., Kontorusova, S.S. (2014). Rol ekspertnyh metodov pri razrabotke upravlencheskikh resheniy. Obrazovanie v KhKhI veke: puty k novym krizisam? Materialy II mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (S. 72–76). Saratov: OOO «Tsentr professionalnogo menedzhmenta «Akademiya Biznesa».
Gusev, V.B. (2013). Refleksivnyy metod ekspertnogo otsenivaniya problemnyh storon gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva. Problemy upravleniya bezopasnostyyu slozhnyh sistem. Trudy XXI Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii (S. 65–69). Moskva: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy gumanitarnyy universitet.
Ermakov, S.V. (2013). Ekspertnoe otsenivanie kak osnova postroeniya metoda formalizovannoy otsenki slozhnosti navigatsionnoy situatsii. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota im. admirala S.O. Makarova, 2, 122–128.
Zhilyakov, E.G., Putivtseva, N.P., Scherbinina, N.V. (2007). Variatsionnyy metod resheniya obratnoy zadachi ekspertnogo otsenivaniya pri parnyh sravneniyakh. Voprosy radioelektroniki, 2(4), 142–155.
Zhuravleva, V.A. (2012). Metod ekspertnogo otsenivaniya: istoricheskaya eksplikatsiya i sovremennaya model. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya, 2, 28–38.
Kireev, Yu.V., Zenin, A.Yu. (2015). Ekspertnoe otsenivanie metodom parnyh sravneniy s ispolzovaniem modeli Rasha izmereniya latentnyh peremennyh. Nauchnyy vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitelnogo universiteta. Seriya: Upravlenie stroitelstvom, 2, 86–89.
Kireev, Yu.V., Moiseev, S.I. (2014). Ekspertnoe otsenivanie kachestvennyh pokazateley metodom Rasha. Konkurentosposobnost. Innovatsii. Finansy, 1, 83–88.
Lisenkov, A.N., Serbinenko, D.V., Kuznetsov, I.V. (2011). Formalizatsiya i ekspertnoe otsenivanie obyektov upravleniya v zadachakh energosberezheniya. Upravlenie kachestvom v neftegazovom komplekse, 2, 26–29.
Muravetskiy, A.N., Tarakanov, A.M. (2014). Ispolzovanie metodov ekspertnogo otsenivaniya v bankovskoy deyatelnosti. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika, 1, 83–90.
Nedashkovskaya, N.I. (2014). Prinyatie resheniy pri soglasovannyh ekspertnyh otsenkakh pervyh sravneniy. Sistemnі doslіdzhennya ta іnformatsіynі tekhnologії, 4, 35–44.
Pernarivskiy, A.V., Orlovskaya, Yu.N. (2011). Ispolzovanie ekspertnyh metodov pri otsenivanii sistemnogo riska v bankovskoy deyatelnosti. Trudy Odesskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 3, 52–57.
Pogodaev, A.K., Glukhov, A.I. (2006). Primenenie metodov ekspertnogo otsenivaniya deyatelnosti predpriyatiy. Informatsionnye tekhnologii modelirovaniya i upravleniya, 7, 800–806.
Radaev, N.N. (2007). Tochnosty ekspertnogo otsenivaniya sostoyaniya obyekta metodom poparnyh sravneniy s kolichestvennoy otsenkoy predpochteniy. Izmeritelnaya tekhnika, 9, 6–11.
Reznikova, N.P., Mikirtichan, A.G. (2011). Umenyshenie neopredelennosti rezultata pri obrabotke i analize ekspertnyh otsenok. T-Comm: Telekommunikatsii i transport, 5(12), 78–82.
Fedoraev, S.V. (2010). Innovatsionnyy potentsial: soderzhanie, struktura, metodika otsenki. Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Gosudarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhby MChS Rossii», 6(2), 23–31.
Chegodaev, A.I. (2010). Matematicheskie metody analiza ekspertnyh otsenok. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2, 130–135.
Shishkina, N.A. (2013). Rol i znachenie metoda ekspertnyh otsenok v sisteme otsenivaniya kachestva innovatsionnyh proektov. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2, 162–165. Fu, C., Yang, J., Yang, S. (2015). A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(3), 886–893. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.042
Li, M. (2013). Individual novices and collective experts: Collective scaffolding in wiki-based small group writing. System, 41(3), 752–769. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.021 Metz, J. (2013). Expert groups in the European Union: A sui generis phenomenon?. Policy and Society, 32(3), 267–278. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.007 Neshati, M., Beigy, H., Hiemstra, D. (2014). Expert group formation using facility location analysis. Information Processing & Management, 50(2), 361–383. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2013.10.001 Yue, Z. (2012). Approach to group decision making based on determining the weights of experts by using projection method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(7), 2900–2910. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.068