bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Community of practice: knowledge creation and dissemination


Babak L.N., Khegay E.V., Mukhsyan T.V.
(about the authors)

Babak Larisa Nikolaevna – (Far Eastern Federal University)

Khegay Elena Valentinovna – (Far Eastern Federal University)

Mukhsyan Tamara Viktorovna – (Far Eastern Federal University)

Published in:
Creative Economy
– Volume 12, Number 10 (October 2018)

JEL classification: D80, I20, I26

Keywords: Far Eastern Federal University, knowledge, practitioners communities, research laboratory


Citation:
Babak L.N., Khegay E.V., Mukhsyan T.V. (2018). Community of practice: knowledge creation and dissemination. Creative Economy, 12(10), 1587-1598. doi: 10.18334/ce.12.10.39484


Share:

Abstract:

The paper presents the results of a study of FEFU research laboratories as formal communities of practice. The case study was chosen as the main method for conducting empirical research. The conducted research has shown that the research laboratories fully comply with the formal communities of practice in the blocks "Characteristics of the staff of research laboratories", "Benefits provided by research laboratories" and partially correspond to the blocks "Characteristics of research laboratories and their processes", "Characteristics of the communication system of research laboratories".







References:
Abigail L.K.M. (2016). Do communities of practice enhance faculty development? Health. 2 61-74.
Andreeva T.E., Gutnikova T.Yu. (2010). Upravlenie znaniyami [Knowledge management] SPb.: Izd-vo «Vysshaya shkola menedzhmenta». (in Russian).
Bourdon I., Kimble C. An analysis of key factors for the success of the communal management of knowledgePs. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com
Drucker P.F. (1992). The new society of organizations Harvard Business Review. 9 95-104.
Dumitru D., Enăchescu V. (2015). Communities of practice as a mean for decentralization Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. (187). 752-756.
Fallah N. (2012). Routines and their influence in the communities of practice (CoPs): the case of international institutions Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 46 1532-1536.
Filatkina I.D., Filatkina M.D. (2017). Soobschestva praktikov: suschnost i rol v sisteme upravleniya znaniyami [Communities of practice: essence and role in the knowledge management system]. Competitiveness in the global world: economy, science, technology. (11-7). 384-387. (in Russian).
Hartung K., Oliveira M. (2013). Communities of practice: creating and sharing knowledge REGE, São Paulo– SP, Brasil. 20 (3). 407-422.
Hildreth P.M., Kimble C. (2002). The Duality of Knowledge Information Research. 8 (1). 1-18.
Hildreth P.M., Wright P., Kimble C. Knowledge management: are we missing something?Ps. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com
Keikotlhaile R.T., Ekambaram A., Halvorsen S.B., Klakegg O.J. (2015). Formalising the informal? – Finding a balance between formal teams and communities of practice in a project-based organization Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. (194). 105-114.
Kimble C., Hildreth P. Communities of Practice: Going One Step Too Far?L\'aim. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com
Lave J., Wenger E. (1990). Situated Learning: Legitimate Periperal Participation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mladkova L. (2015). Dysfunctional Communities of Practice – Thread for Organization Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. (210). 440-448.
Wenger E., Snyder W.M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier Harvard Business Review. 139-147.
Официальный сайт ДВФУ. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://dvfu.ru