bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

The attractiveness of Russian regions for the creative class


Elena Baygusheva
(about the author)

Baygusheva Elena Vladimirovna – Ph.D. student of management department, teaching assistant of the academic department of economics and law, Surgut State Pedagogical University

Published in:
Creative Economy
– № 11 / November, 2012



Keywords: attractiveness of the regions, competitiveness, creative class, creative labor, infrastructure, regional differentiation


Citation:
Elena Baygusheva (2012). The attractiveness of Russian regions for the creative class. Creative Economy, 6(11), 59-64. — url: http://bgscience.ru/com/lib/966


Share:

Abstract:

Nowadays the regional differentiation in the creativity level is evident in the Russian economy. Its highest level is registered in Moscow and St Petersburg, where the specialists of the highest qualification are mainly concentrated. In statistics, there is no comprehensive study of creativity level of Russian regions, which is already being done in other countries in order to analyze the problems of development of the creative economy. The author has analyzed the attractiveness of Russian regions for the creative class, a corresponding rating is drawn up, and also some of the constraints of the creative class development in the regions are singled out.







References:
1. Kalugina Z.I. Ot srednego klassa – k kreativnomu [Tekst] // EKO, 2007, № 10.
2. Rosstat: ofitsialnyy sayt [Elektronnyy resurs] // http:// www.gks.ru.
3. Gorelov N.A., Korableva O.N. Znanie i kreativnosty – osnovnye cherty novogo sotsiuma [Tekst] // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo, 2012, № 2.
4.Andrey Scherbak «Gey-indeks» kak instrument ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Elektronnyy resurs] // http://www.forbes.ru/sobytiya-column/vlast/80957-peterburg-otpravlyaetsya-v-srednevekove.
5. Galkin D.V. Strategiya kulturnogo razvitiya gorodov: sovremennye podkhody [Tekst] // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 2005, № 4.