Beskova T.V.Published in:
Russian Journal of Humanistic Psychology
– Volume 5, Number 1 (January-March 2018)



Keywords: envy, parameters, personal relationships concept, socio-psychological attitude, structure


Share:

Abstract:

The article identifies the challenges of modern science in the study of envy that make it difficult to create an integral picture of this socio-psychological phenomenon. Absence of a serious theoretical and methodological foundation for its study is the main problem. The author believes that the theory of personal relations can be one of such foundations. The article highlights some disagreements between psychologists in understanding the essence of socio-psychological relations. The author proves that reliance on the basic provisions of the personal relationships concept will allow us to study the structure of envy in various ways, in other words, to identify its parameters, using which it will be possible to measure it; to trace the features of the transformation of envy into personal trait. We show the advisability of developing a system-relational approach to the study of envy and other socio-psychological relationships. This approach will involve a synthesis of the systems approach and the personal relationships concept.

Highlights:

•The scientific apparatus of social psychology has a theoretical and methodological potential that promotes a profound revelation of the essence of envy
•The phenomenon of envy is studied by modern science very partially
•The approach to the study may have a high theoretical and methodological potential for studying a wide range of socio-psychological relationships (envy, jealousy, pride, hostility, cynicism).

---

References:
Abramenkova V.V. (2000). Genezis otnosheniy rebenka v sotsialnoy psikhologii detstva [Genesis of the child's relationship in the social psychology of childhood] M.. (in Russian).
Ananev B.G. (2002). Stroenie kharaktera. Psikhologiya individualnyh razlichiy [The structure of the character. The psychology of individual differences] M.: CheRo. (in Russian).
Belogay K.N. (2006). Strukturnye komponenty roditelskogo otnosheniya lichnosti [Structural components of the parental relation of the person] Kemerovo. (in Russian).
Beskova T.V. (2013). Strukturnaya organizatsiya otnosheniya zavisti s pozitsii sistemnogo podkhoda [Structural organization of the relationship of envy from a position of the system approach]. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya i obschestvo. (1). 15-26. (in Russian).
Deryabo S.D., Yasvin V.A. (1994). Ekologicheskaya psikhodiagnostika [Ecological psychodiagnostics] Daugavpils: Saule. (in Russian).
Guseynov A.A., Apresyan R.G. (2001). Etika. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Ethics. Encyclopedic dictionary] M.: Gardariki. (in Russian).
Ilyin E.P. (2012). Psikhologiya obscheniya i mezhlichnostnyh otnosheniy [Psychology of communication and interpersonal relations] SPb.: Piter. (in Russian).
Kasumov T.K. (2012). Zavist na puti k agressii [Envyon on the way to aggression]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo otkrytogo universiteta. Seriya: obschestvenno-politicheskie nauki. (3). 5-22. (in Russian).
Khorni K. (2012). Nevroticheskaya lichnost nashego vremeni [The neurotic personality of our time] M.: Kanon+; Reabilitatsiya. (in Russian).
Kupreychenko A.B., Zhuravlev A.L. (2003). Nravstvenno-psikhologicheskaya regulyatsiya ekonomicheskoy aktivnosti [Moral and psychological regulation of economic activity] M.: Institut psikhologii RAN. (in Russian).
Lazurskiy A.F., Frank S.L. (2001). Programma issledovaniya lichnosti v ee otnoshenii k srede [The program of research on personality in its relation to environment] Selected Works on General Psychology. 124-160. (in Russian).
Levchenko E.V. (2003). Istoriya i teoriya psikhologii otnosheniy [History and theory of psychology of relations] SPb.: Aleteyya. (in Russian).
Levin V.A. (2000). Psikhologiya otnosheniya k prirode [Psychology of attitude to nature] M.: Smysl. (in Russian).
Lichko A.E. (1978). Problema bessoznatelnogo i psikhologicheskie otnosheniya [The problem of the unconscious and psychological relationships] Tbilisi: Metsniereba. (in Russian).
Lomov B.F. (1999). Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology] M.: Nauka. (in Russian).
Mukonina M.V. (2002). Problema professionalnoy otvetstvennosti v kontekste psikhologii otnosheniy [The problem of professional responsibility in the context of the psychology of relations]. Nauchnye trudy Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. (87). 89-97. (in Russian).
Muzdybaev K. (1997). Psikhologiya zavisti [Psychology of envy]. Psychological journal. 18 (6). 3-12. (in Russian).
Myasischev V.N. (2011). Psikhologiya otnosheniy [Psychology of relations] M., Voronezh: MPSI;MODEK. (in Russian).
Pazukhina S.V. (2012). Tsennostnoe otnoshenie buduschego pedagoga k lichnosti uchaschegosya: antropologicheskiy podkhod [Value attitude of the future teacher to the student's personality: the anthropological approach] M.. (in Russian).
Pilishina A.V. (2015). Zavist v kontekste mezhlichnostnyh otnosheniy [Envy in the context of interpersonal relationships] SPb.. (in Russian).
Popov L.M., Golubeva O.Yu., Usitn P.N. (2008). Dobro i zlo v eticheskoy psikhologii lichnosti [Good and evil in the ethical psychology of personality] M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN». (in Russian).
Postnikova M.I. (2011). Psikhologiya otnosheniy mezhdu pokoleniyami v sovremennoy Rossii [Psychology of relations between generations in modern Russia] SPb.. (in Russian).
Poznyakov V.P. (2000). Psikhologicheskie otnosheniya i delovaya aktivnost subektov ekonomicheskoy deyatelnosti v usloviyakh raznyh form sobstvennosti [Psychological attitudes and business activity of subjects of economic activity in conditions of different forms of property ownership]. Psychological journal. (6). 37-49. (in Russian).
Poznyakov V.P. (2012). Psikhologicheskie otnosheniya individualnyh i gruppovyh subektov sovmestnoy zhiznedeyatelnosti [Psychological relations of individual and group subjects of joint life activity]. Psychological journal. 33 (5). 5-15. (in Russian).
Shamionov R.M. (2014). Envy and Monetary Attitudes of Personality Advances in Public, Environmental and Occupational Health. (4). 43-48.
Sheroziya A.E. (1978). Soznatelnoe, bessoznatelnoe psikhicheskoe i sistema fundamentalnyh otnosheniy lichnosti [Conscious, unconscious mental and system of fundamental relationships of personality] Tbilisi: Metsniereba. (in Russian).
Shikhirev P.N. (1999). Sovremennaya sotsialnaya psikhologiya [Modern social psychology] M.: IP RAN; KSP+; Akademicheskiy Proekt. (in Russian).
Starovoytenko E.B. (2006). Otnosheniya lichnosti: filosofsko-psikhologicheskie i refleksivnye modeli [Personality relations: philosophical-psychological and reflexive models]. Mir psikhologii. (4(48)). 26-38. (in Russian).
Varga A.Ya., Drabkina T.S. (2001). Sistemnaya semeynaya psikhoterapiya [Systemic family psychotherapy] SPb.: Rech. (in Russian).
Юнг К.Г., фон Франц М.Л., Хендерсон Дж.Л., Якоби И., Яффе А. Человек и его символы. Концепция коллективного бессознательногоJungland.ru. (in Russian). Retrieved February 21, 2018, from http://jungland.ru/Library/ChelISimvol.htm