bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Model of a life cycle contract in PPP projects in physical education and sport


Savchenko Ya.V., Mikhaylova N.S.
(about the authors)

Savchenko Ya.V. – (The Ural State University of Economics (USUE))

Mikhaylova N.S. – (Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin)

Published in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– Volume 18, Number 24 (December 2017)

JEL classification: L32, L83, Z29

Keywords: concession, implementation form, life cycle contract, model, physical education and sport, public-private partnership


Citation:
Savchenko Ya.V., Mikhaylova N.S. (2017). Model of a life cycle contract in PPP projects in physical education and sport. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18(24), 4249-4260. doi: 10.18334/rp.18.24.38597


Share:

Abstract:

The article analyzes prevalent social infrastructure projects in physical education and sports in Russia. We analyze public-private partnership projects in terms of forms, levels and terms of implementation. We consider foreign forms and models of PPP (public-private partnership) used in physical education and sports practice. We also present an alternative model of state-business interaction in public-private partnership projects developed within the life cycle contract. This model is adapted for the sphere of physical education and sport in Russia. We compare the advantages and disadvantages of two models, namely: the model of life cycle contract and concession agreement which is the most common model of business and power interaction in social infrastructure projects. We consider all advantages and economic benefits of the state and private partner from the use of the lifecycle contract for physical education and sports sphere.







References:
1. Gorchakova E.V. Osobennosti teorii gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. – 2014. – № 3(249). – c. 25-33. – doi: http://bgscience.ru/lib/8483/.
2. Makarov I.N. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo v sisteme vzaimodeystviya biznesa i gosudarstva: institutsionalnyy podkhod // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. – 2013. – № 24(246). – c. 18-29. – url: http://bgscience.ru/lib/8354/.
3. Mataev T.M. Opredelenie i klassifikatsiya form gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva. Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://bgscience.ru/lib/8493/.
4. Babiner D.B. Otzyv na izdanie «Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo: mirovoy opyt i pravovoe regulirovanie v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo. – 2017. – № 2. – c. 155-156. – doi: 10.18334/ppp.4.2.38376.
5. Baranov V.V., Zaytsev A.V., Karpova V.B., Muradov A.A. Formirovanie mekhanizma dinamicheskoy otsenki innovatsionnoy strategii ekonomicheskikh struktur pri realizatsii gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnyorstva // Kreativnaya ekonomika. – 2015. – № 1. – c. 87-100. – doi: 10.18334/ce.9.1.76.
6. Gracheva M.L. Metodika otsenki investitsionnoy privlekatelnosti innovatsionnyh proektov, realizuemyh v ramkakh gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnyorstva // Kreativnaya ekonomika. – 2015. – № 3. – c. 355-364. – doi: 10.18334/ce.9.3.172.
7. Kornev M., Zusman E. GChP v sporte: zarubezhnyy opyt i perspektivy v Rossii. Sport i pravo. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://sportfiction.ru/articles/gchp-v-sporte-zarubezhnyy-opyt-i-perspektivy-v-rossii/ ( data obrascheniya: 26.08.2017 ).
8. Petrikova E.M., Slobodyanyuk N.V. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnyorstvo v sportivnoy industrii Rossii // Problemy ekonomiki. – 2013. – № 3. – c. 111-119. – url: http://www.problecon.com/pdf/2013/3_0/111_119.pdf.
9. Tsepeleva A.D. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnyorstvo v sfere sporta: primenenie zarubezhnogo opyta // Uchyonye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta. – 2013. – № 4(98). – c. 173-177. – url: http://lesgaft-notes.spb.ru/files/4-98-2013/p173-177.pdf.
10. Rosinfra: Platforma podderzhki infrastrukturnyh proektov. Baza proektov. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.pppi.ru/projects ( data obrascheniya: 20.10.2017 ).
11. Tuktarov Yu. Kontrakt sorevnuetsya s soglasheniem. Kak vybraty naibolee effektivnuyu formu realizatsii dogovora. Rossiyskaya Biznes-gazeta: Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://rg.ru/2014/04/22/dogovor.html ( data obrascheniya: 26.08.2017 ).
12. Federalnyy zakon ot 05.04.2013 № 44-FZ «O kontraktnoy sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennyh i munitsipalnyh nuzhd» (red. ot29.07.2017). Sistema Konsultant. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru ( data obrascheniya: 26.08.2017 ).
13. Federalnyy zakon ot 21.07.2005 № 115-FZ (red. ot 29.07.2017) «O kontsessionnyh soglasheniyakh». Sistema Konsultant. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru ( data obrascheniya: 26.08.2017 ).
14. Kontrakt zhiznennogo tsikla (KZhTs) – novyy mekhanizm GChP V Rossii. Kompaniya Vegas Lex. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.pppi.ru/sites/all/themes/pppi/img/life_contract1.pdf ( data obrascheniya: 26.08.2017 ).
15. Savchenko Ya.V., Mikhaylova N.S. Analiz modeley vzaimodeystviya gosudarstva i biznesa v ramkakh GChP v sfere fizkultury i sporta v Rossii. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://creativeconomy.ru/lib/38375 ( data obrascheniya: 20.10.2017 ).
16. Rakuta N.V. Ispolzovanie kontraktov zhiznennogo tsikla pri goszakupkakh. Opyt razvityh stran // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya. – 2015. – № 2. – c. 53-78. – url: https://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2015/07/02/1082135399/%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B0%202-2015.pdf .