Alabugin A.A., Beregovaya I.B.Published in:
Creative Economy
– Volume 11, Number 6 (June 2017)



Keywords: basic and additional management functions, compromise of high-technology goals and development efficiency, model of integration mechanism for managing high-tech industrial production, multiple resource model of integration of transformation factors, types of imbalances of high-technology goals and development efficiency


Share:

Abstract:

The relevance of the research is related to the need to establish a mechanism for managing the processes of formation and development of high-tech industrial production in the conditions of a change in the techno-economic paradigm, which requires a revision of approach of the subjects of management to resource allocation. The approach is shown in a form of a multiple resource model of integration of transformation factors that takes into account the direction and area of influence of investment, intellectual and research resources. The article identifies a number of contradictions that are the sources of problems in the management of the efficiency of high-tech industrial production. We suggest to consider the management of the high-tech industrial production in the conditions of divergence and convergence of systems for improving development efficiency as a purposeful process of management impacts that ensures the level of innovation in high-tech enterprise development in the conditions of diversification of processes, resources and differentiation of results, which is responsible for achieving a competitive state of the socio-economic system (SES) in a compromise zone with their economic efficiency. We also show a cyclic model of the integration control mechanism of high-tech industrial production.

---

References:
Alabugin A.A. (2005). Upravlenie sbalansirovannym razvitiem predpriyatiya v dinamichnoy srede [Managing the balanced development of enterprises in dynamic environment ] Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo YuUrGU. (in Russian).
Alabugin A.A. (2005). Upravlenie sbalansirovannym razvitiem predpriyatiya v dinamichnoy srede [Managing the balanced development of enterprises in dynamic environment] Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo YuUrGU. (in Russian).
Beregovaya I.B. (2013). K voprosu ob upravlenii konkurentosposobnostyu predpriyatiya [On enterprise’s competitive ability control]. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: economics and management. 7 (2). 137-142. (in Russian).
Beregovaya I.B., Beregovoy B.A. (2012). Sistemnyy podkhod k upravleniyu konkurentosposobnostyu predpriyatiya [System approach to enterprise competitiveness management]. Intelligence. Innovation. Investments. (5-1 (22) ). 117-120. (in Russian).
Bukhvalov N.Yu. (2016). Metodologiya formirovaniya i razvitiya vysokotekhnologichnogo sektora ekonomiki [Methodology for formation and development of high-tech sector of economy] Ekaterenburg. (in Russian).
Gelbreyt Dzh. (2004). Novoe industrialnoe obschestvo [New industrial society] M.; SPB.: OOO «Izdatelstvo AST»; OOO «Tranzitkniga»; : Terra Fantastica. (in Russian).
Keyler V. A. (1973). Ekonomika predpriyatiya [Enterprise economy] Moskva, Novosibirsk: Infra-M, NGAEiU, \. (in Russian).
Romanova O.A., Akberdina V.V., Bukhvalov N.Yu. (2016). Obschie tsennosti novoy tekhniko-ekonomicheskoy paradigmy [Shared Values in the Formation of a Modern Techno-Economic Paradigm]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii i prognoz. (3(45)). 173-190. (in Russian). doi: 10.15838/esc/2016.3.45.10 .
Shebab Al Makale (2013). Neoindustrializatsiya. Novaya epokha dlya novyh rynkov [Non-industrialization. New era for new markets]. WorldEconomicJournal. (in Russian).
Технократическая концепция и ее критикаBiofile. (in Russian). Retrieved March 20, 2017, from http://biofile.ru/chel/11914.html