bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Evaluation methods of economic integration consequences for the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union


Drobot E.V., Kostyleva S.O.
(about the authors)

Drobot Elena Valerevna – (Vyborg branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation)

Kostyleva Svetlana Olegovna – (North-West institute of Management – Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administation)

Published in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– Volume 18, Number 1 (January 2017)



Keywords: aggregative indicator of integration, Eurasian Economic Union, integration degree, international economic integration


Citation:
Drobot E.V., Kostyleva S.O. (2017). Evaluation methods of economic integration consequences for the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18(1), 23-40. doi: 10.18334/rp.18.1.37212


Share:

Abstract:

In article the analysis of consequences of economic integration for the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) is carried out. For this purpose authors apply models of the high-quality analysis – Isikava's chart and SWOT analysis on the basis of which the conclusion about opportunities of expansion of EEU and its problems is drawn. In article the author's assessment technique of countries integration to world economy degree is given which on the basis of aggregation of key economic indicators allows to give a «quantitative» idea of integration consequences for the countries-participants. The article will be interesting to the specialists who are engaged in study of problems of the international economic integration and foreign economic activity.







References:
Dagaev A.A. (2010). Integratsiya stran BRIK v mirovoe tekhnologicheskoe prostranstvo [Integration of the countries of BRIC into world technological space]. Kreativnaya ekonomika. (4). 9-16. (in Russian).
Drobot E.V. (2015). Upravlenie konkurentosposobnostyu natsionalnoy ekonomiki v usloviyakh globalizatsii: monografiya [Management of competitiveness of national economy in the conditions of globalization: monograph] SPb.: Troitskiy most. (in Russian).
Ivanenko I.A. (2015). Komparativnyy analiz metodik rascheta indeksov globalizatsii ekonomiki [Komparativny analysis of method of calculation of indexes of globalization of economy]. Ekonomika i pravo. (1). 4-7. (in Russian).
Lomovtseva O.A., Shkromada V.I., Lebedev A.O (2014). Metodicheskie aspekty otsenki integratsionnyh vozmozhnostey regiona [Methodical aspects of assessment of integration opportunities of the region]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Informatika. (21). 12-21. (in Russian).
Morozova G.V. (2015). Rossiya v ramkakh Evraziyskoy integratsii [Russia within the Euroasian integration]. Molodoy uchenyy. (3). 456-459. (in Russian).
Muhittin Kaplan, Muhsin Kar (2006). The empirical analysis of economic integration: a literature survey Marmara journal of european studies. (2). 45-75.
Polevoy D.I. (2007). Perspektivy valyutnoy integratsii na prostranstve SNG dlya rossiyskogo biznesa [The prospects of currency integration on space of the CIS for the Russian business]. Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. (4). 8-12. (in Russian).
Quantifying Economic Integration of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union: Methodological ApproachesEDB Centre for Integration Studies. Retrieved from http://www.vinokurov.info/assets/files/report_23_en.pdf
Shunsuke Managi, Hironori Kawajiri, Tetsuya Tsurumi (2005). Regional economic integration and trade: an empirical evaluation of NAFTA and EU International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology (IJARGE). 4 (1).
Surzhikov M.A. (2012). Evolyutsiya integratsionnyh struktur v mezhdunarodnoy torgovle: teoriya i praktika [Evolution of integration structures in international trade: theory and practice]. [] . 54. (in Russian).