bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Development of methods for the program-oriented and goal-oriented approach to regulation of local social and economic systems


Elena V. Kizil
(about the author)

Kizil Elena V. – Candidate of Science, Economics, Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Chair of Economics, Finance and Accounting (Komsomolsk-na-Amure State Technical University)

Published in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– Volume 17, Number 23 (December 2016)

JEL classification: H71, R11, R28

Keywords: implementation of stakeholders' group and individual interests, objective and subjective principle for systematization of program events, state programs of the federal subject


Citation:
Elena V. Kizil (2016). Development of methods for the program-oriented and goal-oriented approach to regulation of local social and economic systems. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17(23), 3443–3462. doi: 10.18334/rp.17.23.37105


Share:

Abstract:

Presentation of the potential for development of the local territory as points of governmental (municipal) programs composed in a certain manner allows to consider it as the target level of the potential for a certain period (the lifetime of a program). Methodical tools of qualitative evaluation of the potential for development of the local territory is used. It allows to adjust (to optimize) volumes of financing for the next stage of the program, while orienting to the potential opportunities of the territory, as well as to the realization of interests of the population, business and governmental authorities. Different scenarios are developed (taking into account the “set” of relevant program indicators) for the process of regulation of the development potential via optimization of the potential's components that represent interests of different stakeholders' groups [As E. Freeman interprets it, “the interested party, individuals, groups and communities that are not indifferent to the result of the company's activity” [2, p. 109]]. The matrix of correspondence of individual and group interests of the government, business and the population to optimal components of the development potential is completed.







References:
1. Ayrapetyan L.N. Vzaimodeystvie vlasti i biznesa pri razrabotke i realizatsii tselevyh programm: Dis. … kand. ekon. nauk. – Moskva, 2014. – 188 s.
2. Blagov Yu.E. Klassika teorii menedzhmenta // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya «Menedzhment». – 2012. – № 1. – S. 109-116.
3. Bukhvald E.M. Sistema strategicheskogo planirovaniya kak klyuchevoy instrument modernizatsii rossiyskoy ekonomiki // Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskie nauki. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 10-15.
4. Gaskarov A.R. Tselevye programmy kak instrument obespecheniya finansovo-ekonomicheskoy ustoychivosti subyekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii (na primere respubliki Bashkortostan): Avtoref. dis. … kand. ekon. nauk. – Moskva, 2007. – 24 s.
5. Granberg A.G. Osnovy regionalnoy ekonomiki. – M.: ID GU VShE, 2004. – 495 s.
6. Ivobotenko B.A., Ilyinskiy N.F., Kopylov I.P. Planirovanie eksperimenta v elektromekhanike. – M.: Energiya, 1975. – 184 s.
7. Elokhov A.M. Munitsipalnaya sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya sistema kak obyekt programmno-tselevogo upravleniya // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ekonomika. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 6-19.
8. Zhits G.I. Sposobnosti po realizatsii vozmozhnostey: prodolzhenie rassuzhdeniy o metodologii otsenki innovatsionnogo potentsiala sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem razlichnogo urovnya slozhnosti // Innovatsii. – 2008. – № 8. – S. 75-78.
9. Karkavin M.V. Organizatsiya strategicheskogo razvitiya krupnogo goroda: programmno-tselevoy metod // Fundamentalnye issledovaniya. – 2014. – № 12. – S. 1973-1978.
10. Kizil E.V. Institutsionalnyy podkhod k issledovaniyu potentsiala razvitiya territorii // Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya. – 2016. – № 3. – S. 112-133.
11. Kizil E.V. Metodologicheskiy podkhod k opredeleniyu potentsiala razvitiya lokalnyh sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. – 2016. – № 4. – S. 80-86.
12. Kizil E.V. Otsenka vliyaniya obschestvennyh zatrat na kriterii urovnya sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya territorii // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. – 2016. – T. 17. – № 22. – S. 3129–3148. – doi: 10.18334/rp.17.22.36939
13. Kiyanova L.D., Litvinova T.I. Suschnosty programmno-tselevogo metoda kak instrument upravleniya sotsialno-ekonomicheskim razvitiem territoriy // Novye tekhnologii. – 2014. – № 2. – http://lib.mkgtu.ru/index.php?option=com_journal&view=folder&Itemid=107&folder=2014-02
14. Klimanov V.V., Mikhaylova A.A. Strategii na regionalnom i munitsipalnom urovne // Finansy. – 2011. – № 2. – C. 9–14.
15. Klimanov V.V., Chernyshova N.A. Gosprogrammy regionov: itogi 2015 goda // Byudzhet. – 2016. – № 7. – http://www.irof.ru/filemanager/files/statia2.pdf
16. Klimova L.A., Khusnullina G.Z. Otsenka ispolzovaniya programmno-tselevyh metodov upravleniya v sovremennyh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh. – Ufa: ISEI UNTs RAN, 2015. – 155 s.
17. Kochinev Yu.Yu., Serebrenikov V.A. Tekhnika planirovaniya eksperimenta: Uchebnoe posobie. – L.: LPI, 1986. – 70 s.
18. Miterev M.A. Programmno-tselevye metody planirovaniya kak instrument gosudarstvennogo razvitiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem // Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie «Trudy MELI: elektronnyy zhurnal». – 2009. – № 8. – http://refdb.ru/look/1331301.html
19. Mitrofanova I.V., Tsulaya I.N. Programmno-tselevoy podkhod v sisteme strategicheskogo upravleniya territorialnym razvitiem: kriticheskoe osmyslenie sovremennogo otechestvennogo i zarubezhnogo opyta // Natsionalnye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost. – 2008. – № 10. – S. 46-54.
20. Indikativnoe planirovanie: teoriya i puti sovershenstvovaniya: Monografiya / A.N. Petrov, L.G. Demidova, S.M. Klimov [i dr.]. – SPb: Znanie, 2000. – 96 s. – S. 51‒54.
21. Popov R.A. Sistemologiya regionalnogo khozyaystva. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2010. – 223 s.
22. Rayzberg B.A. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie ekonomicheskimi i sotsialnymi protsessami: Uchebnoe posobie. – M.: INFRA-M, 2010. – 384 s.
23. Stolyarov O.I., Polischuk K.V. Sovershenstvovanie ispolzovaniya programmno-tselevogo metoda dlya resheniya problem razvitiya regionov // Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza Rossiyskoy akademii nauk: Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. – 2008. – T. 34. – S. 215-234.
24. Ekonomika i finansovoe obespechenie innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti: Uchebnoe posobie / I.L. Tukkel, S.N. Yashin, E.V. Koshelev [i dr.]. – SPb: BKhV-Peterburg, 2011. – 240 s.
25. Fedotova G.V. Razvitie metodologii programmno-tselevogo planirovaniya ekonomicheskikh protsessov na osnove institutsionalizatsii obratnyh svyazey v upravlenii: Avtoref. dis. … dok. ekon. nauk. – Kursk, 2015. – 35 s.
26. Yanchenko A.V. Obrabotka dannyh i planirovanie aktivnogo eksperimenta. – Komsomolsk-na-Amure: KnAGTU, 2005. – 74 s.