bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Analysis of the relevance and effectiveness of the state support for innovation activity (on the example of Association of Innovative Regions of Russia members)


Burets Yu.S., Akerman E.N., Akerman E.A., Volokhova A.M.
(about the authors)

Burets Yuliya Sergeevna – (Tomsk Polytechnic University)

Akerman Elena Nikolaevna – (Tomsk Polytechnic University)

Akerman Ekaterina Aleksandrovna – (Tomsk Polytechnic University)

Volokhova Aleksandra Mikhaylovna – (National Research Tomsk State University)

Published in:
Russian Journal of Innovation Economics
– Volume 6, Number 4 (October-December 2016)



Keywords: AIRR, government support, innovation activity, innovation policy


Citation:
Burets Yu.S., Akerman E.N., Akerman E.A., Volokhova A.M. (2016). Analysis of the relevance and effectiveness of the state support for innovation activity (on the example of Association of Innovative Regions of Russia members). Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, 6(4), 293-302. doi: 10.18334/vinec.6.4.37092


Share:

Abstract:

The article presents the results of a poll for the subjects of innovative activity of AIRR regions (innovative companies, universities, organizations of innovation infrastructure) about the effectiveness, frequency and the need to use measures of state support of innovative activity, as well as key challenges to their innovation activities. The authors summarize the measures lists (effective, in demand, not used etc.) which can be used for selection of priority measures for subjects of innovative activity support in conditions of limited regional budgets.


Highlights:

- the core of the problem field is the lack of organizations own resources
- the most effective measures in practice are with financial support
- the most popular measures are subsidizing of R & d projects, competitions of innovative projects, subsidies in the form of grants and scholarships
- among the unused measures – tax incentives, subsidizing costs of certification, state credit guarantees, assistance in attraction of investors







References:
Akerman E. N., Mikhalchuk A. A., Burets Yu. S. (2014). Klasterizatsiya regionov AIRR kak predposylka formirovaniya mezhregionalnoy innovatsionnoy politiki [Clustering of AIRR regions as a prerequisite for the interregional innovation policy formation
]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. (399). 175-182. (in Russian).
Akerman E.N., Burets Yu.S. (2013). Intellektualnaya renta kak istochnik i rezultat innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Intellectual rent as a source and result of innovative development]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. (374). 134-136. (in Russian).
Burets Yu.S. (2016). Upravlenie integratsionnymi vzaimodeystviyami na osnove diagnostiki razryvov innovatsionnogo protsessa [The integration interactions management based on the diagnosis of the innovation process ruptures]. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal. (8). 21-25. (in Russian).
Kozlovskaya O.V., Akerman E.N. (2013). Analiz mer gosudarstvennoy podderzhki v sfere innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti v regionakh – chlenakh AIRR [Analysis of state support in the sphere of innovative activities in the regions – members of AIRR]. Eco. (11). 65-85. (in Russian).