Andrey ZaytcevPublished in:
Russian Journal of Innovation Economics
– Volume 6, Number 2 (April-June, 2016)

JEL classification: M11, O00, O32

Keywords: innovative management concept of kaizen, lean, life cycle management concept, the Russian School of Management


Share:

Abstract:

The paper identified and analyzed the gap between theory and practice of innovation management concepts to Russian enterprises. A model of the life cycle management concept, which is based on the studied works of Russian authors dedicated kaizen philosophy and concepts of lean manufacturing. Based on a study of more than 300 scientific works of domestic authors on the philosophy of kaizen and lean manufacturing concept shows the distribution of works by type of research and in stages according to model life-cycle management concept. As a result of the analysis as the most actual directions of further development of the philosophy of kaizen and lean manufacturing concepts in domestic science taking into account the requests of enterprises offered to develop a strategy and tools for the implementation of these concepts.

Highlights:

► between the views of the academic community and practitioners (managers and entrepreneurs), there follows a rigid division: scientists develop management with the theoretical positions and entrepreneurs focused on solving current problems perceiving proposed by the scientific community approach as a "theory", which does not account for, and can not solve their problems
► negative consequence of the contradiction between the theoretical management and business practices, on the one hand, the inefficient use of available resources of Russian companies, in which the technological equipment of increases, but the lag persists in improving organizational and management processes
► cause contradictions of science and practice of management is that the theoretical and practical part of the management concepts are interrelated through the development of strategies and implementation of management tools concept
► analysis of the works of Russian authors on the philosophy of kaizen and lean manufacturing concept has allowed to classify them into the following groups: review work and work with minimal or no scientific novelty novelty; practical work with the results of the implementation of innovative management concepts; analytical work, studying the problems of innovative management concepts and offering approaches to their solution; scientific and practical work to develop innovative management concepts
► to minimize the gap between theory and practice is especially urgent to develop a strategy and a unified tool of transition to the principles of the philosophy of kaizen and lean manufacturing concepts

---

References:
1. Abrosimova A.A., Shalabaev P.S. Svyazy berezhlivogo proizvodstva s ustoychivym razvitiem promyshlennyh predpriyatiy. // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo, 2013. – № 24 (246). – s. 78-83.
2. Alenina M.N., Shemshurova N.G. «Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo» i vozmozhnosty vnedreniya LEAN-tekhnologiy na rossiyskikh predpriyatiyakh. // Kachestvo v obrabotke materialov, 2014. – № 1. – s. 70-77.
3. Ardysheva A.A., Soldatova S.V., Zhirnova E.A. Problemy vnedreniya berezhlivogo proizvodstva v Rossii. // Aktualnye problemy aviatsii i kosmonavtiki, 2014. – Tom 1, № 10. – s. 244-245.
4. Arshba L.N., Zharikova N.A. Vnedrenie instrumentov berezhlivogo proizvodstva v strukturnyh podrazdeleniyakh zheleznodorozhnogo transporta. // Universum: ekonomika i yurisprudentsiya, 2014. – № 5 (6).
5. Akhtulov A.L., Akhtulova L.N., Stadolskaya T.I. Ispolzovanie kart potoka sozdaniya tsennosti kak sredstvo postoyannogo uluchsheniya deyatelnosti organizatsii. // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik, 2013. – № 6 (107). – s. 151-162.
6. Balashova E.S., Gromova E.A. Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo v rossiyskoy promyshlennosti kak innovatsionnaya strategiya razvitiya. // Innovatsionnaya nauka, 2015. – № 8-1. – s. 12-14.
7. Berezovskiy E.E. Praktika berezhlivogo proizvodstva v organizatsii proizvodstvennogo protsessa na predpriyatiyakh promyshlennogo sektora Rossii. // Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU, 2013. – № 91. – s. 1-20.
8. Bikmukhametova Ch.Z. Organizatsiya upravlencheskogo ucheta zatrat na predpriyatiyakh, vnedryayuschikh printsipy «berezhlivogo proizvodstva». // Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 2013. – № 7-1.
9. Vumek Dzh.P, Dzhons D.T. Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo. Kak izbavitysya ot potery i dobitysya protsvetaniya vashey kompanii. – Alpina Pablisher, 2008. – 476 s.
10. Vumek Dzh.P, Dzhons D.T., Rus. D. Mashina, kotoraya izmenila mir. – Popurri, 2007. – 384 s.
11. Veyder M.T. Instrumenty berezhlivogo proizvodstva II. Karmannoe rukovodstvo po praktike primeneniya Lean. – Alpina Pablisher, 2015. – 160 s.
12. Veyder M.T. Instrumenty berezhlivogo proizvodstva. Mini-rukovodstvo po vnedreniyu metodik berezhlivogo proizvodstva. – Alpina Pablisher, 2012. – 125 s.
13. Galitskaya D.A., Kukartsev A.V. Metodologiya kaydzen v Rossii. // Aktualnye problemy aviatsii i kosmonavtiki, 2012. – Tom 2, № 8. – s. 168-170.
14. Goldsbi T., Martichenko R. Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo i 6 sigm v logistike. Rukovodstvo po optimizatsii logisticheskikh protsessov. – Grevtsov Pablisher, 2009. – 416 s.
15. Grinin A.Yu. Upravlenie zavodom v stile kaydzen. Kak snizity zatraty i povysity pribyl. – Alpina Pablisher, 2012. – 192 s.
16. Davydova N.S. Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo kak faktor povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiya. // Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona, 2012. – Tom 20, № 2. – s. 720-727.
17. Davydova N.S., Klochkov Yu.P. Model upravleniya vnedreniem sistemy «Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo» na predpriyatii. // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta, 2012. – № 2-4. – s. 32-35.
18. Davydova N.S., Yakovleva E.V. Povyshenie effektivnosti deyatelnosti predpriyatiy obrabatyvayuschikh proizvodstv na osnove instrumentov berezhlivogo proizvodstva. // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta, 2011. – № 2-3. – s. 19-24.
19. Efimychev Yu.I., Plekhova Yu.O. Realizatsiya rezervov razvitiya promyshlennogo predpriyatiya na osnove kontseptsii berezhlivogo proizvodstva. // Vestnik NNGU im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2007. – № 1. – s. 223-227.
20. Efremova L.I., Kurganov A.N. Metodologicheskie podkhody k sovershenstvovaniyu biznes-protsessov predpriyatiya. // Sistemnoe upravlenie, 2016. – № 2 (31).
21. Zaytseva G.V., Abdrashitova A.R. Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniya zapasami predpriyatiya. // Obschestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2011. – № 2. – s. 64-71.
22. Zaretskiy A.D., Ivanova T.E. Innovatsionnoe ispolzovanie tekhnologiy kak osnova berezhlivogo proizvodstva. // Osnovy ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, 2012. – № 3 (3). – s. 59-62.
23. Ignatova L.V. Berezhlivoe upravlenie berezhlivym predpriyatiem. // Ekonomika i upravlenie v XXI veke: tendentsii razvitiya, 2016. № 29. – s. 110-113.
24. Imai M. Gemba kaydzen. Puty k snizheniyu zatrat i povysheniyu kachestva. – M.: Alpina Pablisher, 2016. – 424 s.
25. Imai M. Kaydzen: klyuch k uspekhu yaponskikh kompaniy. – M.: Alpina Pablisherz, 2009. – 276 s.
26. Karpova N.P., Gorbachyova S.A. Rossiyskiy puty berezhlivogo proizvodstva. // Sbornik trudov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Ekonomika i sovremennyy menedzhment: teoriya i praktika», 2015. – № 2 (46).
27. Kirillova L.G., Muratova G.Ya. Vnedrenie sistemy berezhlivogo proizvodstva na predpriyatiyakh malogo i srednego biznesa. problemy i perspektivy. // Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 2007. – Tom 16, № 16. – s. 159-161.
28. Klochkov Yu.P. «Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo»: ponyatiya, printsipy, mekhanizmy. // Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona, 2012. – Tom 20, № 2. – s. 429-437.
29. Klochkov Yu.P. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskie osnovy vnedreniya berezhlivogo proizvodstva na predpriyatiyakh mashinostroeniya. // Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona, 2012. – № 3. – s. 100-106.
30. Klochkov Yu.P. Organizatsionnye mekhanizmy vnedreniya berezhlivogo proizvodstva na promyshlennom predpriyatii. // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya, 2012. – № 5. – s. 268-272.
31. Klochkov Yu.P. Tekhnologii upravleniya materialnymi i informatsionnymi potokami v berezhlivom proizvodstve. // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya, 2012. – № 10. – s. 285-290.
32. Kokaryova V.V., Smelov V.G., Shitarev I.L. Imitatsionnoe modelirovanie proizvodstvennyh protsessov v ramkakh kontseptsii «berezhlivogo proizvodstva». // Vestnik SGAU, 2012. – № 3-3 (34). – s. 131-136.
33. Korolyova N.A. Povyshenie ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti predpriyatiy Rossii na osnove vnedreniya kontseptsii berezhlivogo proizvodstva. // Science Time, 2015. – № 6 (18). – s. 235-243.
34. Kostenko T.O. Ispolzovanie preimuschestv sistemy kaydzen dlya povysheniya proizvoditelnosti truda. // Vіsnik Kiivsykogo natsionalnogo universitetu im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriya: Ekonomika, 2013. – № 151. – s. 122-126.
35. Kravchenko E.V. Uroki osvoeniya metodik «berezhlivogo proizvodstva» v Tatarstane. // Vestnik gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya, 2013. – № 2. – s. 114-117.
36. Krishtal M.M., Zaytseva N.A. Spetsifika vnedreniya kontseptsii «berezhlivogo proizvodstva» v otechestvennyh usloviyakh. // Vektor nauki TGU, 2010. – № 3. – s. 158-160.
37. Kuzakhmetov K.R., Usachyova M.M., Karpova N.P. Tipichnye oshibki pri vnedrenii sistemy 5S v praktiku rossiyskikh predpriyatiy. // Materialy VIII zaochnoy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Reshenie problem razvitiya predpriyatiy: rol nauchnyh issledovaniy» (3 marta 2016 g.). – Krasnodar, Nauchno-izdatelskiy tsentr Apriori, 2016. – s. 13-17.
38. Layker Dzh.K. Dao Toyota: 14 printsipov menedzhmenta veduschey kompanii mira. – M. Alpina Biznes Buks, 2007. – 400 s.
39. Layker Dzh.K., Mayer D. Praktika dao Toyota: Rukovodstvo po vnedreniyu printsipov menedzhmenta Toyota. – M. Alpina Biznes Buks, 2007. – 584 s.
40. Letskiy V.P. Formirovanie proizvodstvennoy sistemy mashinostroitelnogo predpriyatiya: realizatsiya filosofskogo podkhoda v prakticheskoy deyatelnosti. // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya, 2015. – № 4. – s. 64-69.
41. Limaryov A.S., Penzina K.O. Analiz osnovnyh vidov potery na proizvodstve. // Kachestvo v obrabotke materialov, 2016. - № 1 (5). – s. 15-17.
42. Medvedeva V.R. Izmenenie myshleniya sotrudnikov predpriyatiya cherez prizmu kontseptsii «berezhlivoe proizvodstvo» kak faktor, povyshayuschiy uroveny ego konkurentosposobnosti. // Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 2012. – Tom 15, № 9. – s. 256-258.
43. Naugolnova I.A. Otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt primeneniya sistemy berezhlivogo proizvodstva na promyshlennyh predpriyatiyakh. // Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena, 2014. – № 170. – s. 95-98.
44. Nedbaylyuk B.E., Antonova I.I., Antonov S.A., Kudryashov V.N., Galyaviev L.Kh. Metody berezhlivogo proizvodstva v nepreryvnyh proizvodstvennyh protsessakh. // Aktualnye problemy ekonomiki i prava, 2011. – № 1 (17). – s. 102-110.
45. Nikulina O.V., Rudenko O.N., Konovalenko D.G. Sravnenie sistem rossiyskogo i zarubezhnogo primeneniya metodik berezhlivogo proizvodstva. // Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal, 2014. – № 11-3 (30). – s. 40-44.
46. Ovsyannikova A.O., Shirochenko N.V. Kaydzen: preimuschestva tekhnologii i problemy vnedreniya na rossiyskikh predpriyatiyakh. // Aktualnye problemy aviatsii i kosmonavtiki, 2011. – Tom 2, № 7. – s. 237-239.
47. Ptuskin A.S., Antsev V.Yu., Vitchuk N.A. Metodika rascheta pokazateley effektivnosti proekta vnedreniya instrumentov berezhlivogo proizvodstva. // Izvestiya TulGU. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, 2014. – № 5-1. – s. 253-266.
48. Romanovskaya E.V., Semakhin E.A., Andryashina N.S. Sistema upravleniya berezhlivym proizvodstvom v avtomobilnoy promyshlennosti. // Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk, 2014. – № 4-1.
49. Selivanov S.G., Nikitin V.V., Druzhinina M.A., Shipilova V.G. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema tekhnologicheskoy podgotovki berezhlivogo proizvodstva v mashinostroenii. // Vestnik UGATU, 2009. – Tom 13, № 1. – s. 121-127.
50. Smirnov V.A., Antonova I.I., Antonov S.A., Akhmadeeva G.Ch. Ustanovlenie pokazateley effektivnosti «berezhlivogo proizvodstva». // Aktualnye problemy ekonomiki i prava, 2011. – № 3-19. – s. 146-153.
51. Suetina T.A., Rakhimova G.S. Povyshenie konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiya s pomoschyyu sistemy berezhlivogo proizvodstva. // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo, 2014. – № 18 (264). – s. 72-80.
52. Fomichyov A.N. Kolichestvennaya otsenka proizvoditelnosti upravlencheskogo truda. // Vestnik RGGU, 2013. – № 6 (107). – s. 151-162.
53. Khobbs D.P. Vnedrenie berezhlivogo proizvodstva: prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po optimizatsii biznesa. – Minsk: Grevtsov Pablisher, 2007. – 352 s.
54. Chernov V.B., Dobrynin A.A. Sovershenstvovanie proizvodstvennoy sistemy na osnove sinteza kontseptsiy «6 sigm + berezhlivoe proizvodstvo» i «teorii ogranicheniy sistem». // Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment, 2012. – № 30. – s. 167-170.
55. Chernova Yu.K., Schipanov V.V. Primenenie metoda «Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo + Shesty sigm» v logistike. // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 2010. – Tom 12, № 4-4. – s. 835-840.