Sergey A. KorobovPublished in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– Volume 17, Number 19 (October 2016)

JEL classification: L26, L50, O11

Keywords: potential, resource-oriented approach, small and medium-sized business, social and economic development, state policy


Share:

Abstract:

The sustainable social and economic development of the small and medium-sized businesses is the significant structural part of the economy of any country, its basis and the key element of the mechanism for provision of competitiveness. For this, one needs (1) to review the historical development of the resource-oriented approach; (2) to prove priority of the use of the resource-oriented approach for social and economic development issues in small and medium-sized businesses; (3) to mark out directions of the social and economic development of the Russian small and medium-sized business for the purpose the use of the resource-oriented approach. The study is based on the complex analysis of main theoretic models of the resource-oriented approach as well as of opportunities and potential of the resource-oriented approach for improvement of the social and economic situation of Russian small and medium-sized businesses. The author believes that the resource-oriented approach may be successfully used for the state support of small and medium-sized businesses as it allows to provide the maximum social and economic effectiveness of resource development in the region.

---

References:
1. Korobov S.A., Fomina S.I. Formirovanie vektorov gosudarstvennoy podderzhki subyektov malogo i srednego predprinimatelstva (na primere Volgogradskoy oblasti) // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya. – 2011. – T. 3. – № 1. – S. 31-38.
2. Inshakov O.V. «Yadro razvitiya» v kontekste novoy teorii faktorov proizvodstva // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. – 2003. – № 1. – S. 11-25.
3. Frolov D.P., Moseiko V.O., Korobov S.A. Entrepreneurial Activity Self-Production Conditions within Territorial Clusters // Asian Social Science. – 2015. – Vol. 11. – № 20. – P. 9-15. – doi:10.5539/ass.v11n20p9
4. Grant R.M. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation // California Management Review. – 1991. – Vol. 33. – № 3. – P. 114-135.
5. Hofer C. W., Schendel D. Strategy Formulation: Analytic Concepts. – St. Paul: West Group, 1978. – 234 p.
6. Lazonick W. Innovative Enterprise and Historical Transformation // Enterprise & Society. – 2002. – Vol. 3. – № 1. – P. 3-47.
7. Nelson R. Why Do Firms Differ, and How Does It Matter? // Strategic Management Journal. – 1991. – Vol. 12. – № S2. – P. 61-74.
8. Penrose E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. – N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1980. – 265 p.
9. Prahalad C., Hamel G. The Core Competence of the Corporation // Harvard Business Review. – 1990. – Vol. 68. – № 3. – P. 79-91.
10. Richardson G. The Organisation of Industry // Economic Journal. – 1972. – Vol. 82. – № 327. – P. 883-896.
11. Rumelt R., Towards A. Strategic Theory of the Firm // Competitive strategic management. – Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1984. – P. 556-570.
12. Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management of the company // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series «Management». – 2003. – № 4. – P. 133-185.
13. Wernerfelt B. A Resource-Based View of the Firm // Strategic Management Journal. – 1984. – Vol. 5. – № 2. – P. 171-180.
14. De Wit B., Meyer R. Strategy: Process, Content, Context: An International Perspective. – Cincinnati: South-Western College Publication, 2004. – 1252 p.
15. Adizes I. Mastering Change: The Power of Mutual Trust and Respect in Personal Life, Family Life, Business and Society. – Santa Monika: Adizes Institute, 1991. – 240 p.
16. Knight F. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. – N.Y.: Martino Fine Books, 2014. – 394 p.
17. Moseiko V.O., Korobov S.A., Frolov D.P. Socio-Economic Systems’ Competitiveness Assessment Method // Asian Social Science. – 2015. – Vol. 11. – № 20. – R. 1-8.