Aleksei V. KashirinPublished in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– Volume 17, Number 17 (September 2016)

JEL classification: L21, O20, O32

Keywords: innovation development, innovation management, key performance indices, science-intensive enterprises


Share:

Abstract:

In the given work, the author proposes his method of adapting the method of key performance indices to the development tasks of science-intensive enterprises. This problem is relevant due to the combination of the processes of introduction of foreign management methods by Russian enterprises and also due to the existing attention to the innovational development of the country. For the solution of this task the author discusses the methodological grounds of KEI system (Key Efficiency Indices), its implementation in the methodology of the innovational development program. After that the author discusses the peculiarities of science-intensive enterprises management and the main problem – staff potential development. Finally, the author proposes to adapt KEI method to the task of staff development at a science-intensive enterprise. In result, author’s approach to KEI system oriented towards the solution of the task of staff and personnel reserve development at a science-intensive enterprise has been formed.

---

References:
1. Arutyunov Yu.A., Sharanin A.S. Razvitie diktuet peremeny. innovatsionnoe razvitie kak ekonomicheskaya kategoriya // Kreativnaya ekonomika. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 8-12.
2. Galkin V.V., Dudkina M.N. Osobennosti upravleniya predpriyatiyami naukoemkogo biznesa // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. – 2009. – T. 5. – № 5. – S. 250-252.
3. Metodicheskie materialy po razrabotke programm innovatsionnogo razvitiya aktsionernyh obschestv s gosudarstvennym uchastiem, gosudarstvennyh korporatsiy i federalnyh gosudarstvennyh unitarnyh predpriyatiy, utv. Rasporyazheniem Ministerstvom ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.01.2011 № 3R-OF.
4. Razrabotka sistemy klyuchevyh pokazateley (KPI) dlya proizvodstvennogo predpriyatiya [Elektronnyy resurs] // Komtekh. – 2010. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.comtec.ru/products/crm/mat/Comtec%20CRM%20KPI.pdf
5. Polozhenie o poryadke provedeniya otsenki kachestva razrabotki (aktualizatsii) i ezhegodnoy nezavisimoy otsenki realizatsii programm innovatsionnogo razvitiya aktsionernyh obschestv s gosudarstvennym uchastiem, gosudarstvennyh korporatsiy i federalnyh gosudarstvennyh unitarnyh predpriyatiy.
6. Postnikova T.V. Otsenka klyuchevyh pokazateley effektivnosti na primere integrirovannoy tsepi postavki // Nauka i obrazovanie: nauchnoe izdanie MGTU im. N.E. Baumana. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 36.
7. Prokofyev S.A. Vnedrenie sistemy upravleniya effektivnostyyu na osnove klyuchevyh pokazateley effektivnosti v organizatsii // Fundamentalnye i prikladnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire. – 2014. – T. 2. – № 5. – S. 133-137.
8. Perfileva E. Rezerv iz perspektivnogo stal operativnym: kadrovyy rezerv v OAO «Silovye mashiny» [Elektronnyy resurs] // Upravlenie proizvodstvom. – 2011. – 12 aprelya. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.up-pro.ru/library/personnel_management/reserve/operativnyj-rezerv.html
9. Saveleva I.V. Osobennosti sistemy planirovaniya na naukoemkom predpriyatii s uchetom sinergeticheskogo podkhoda // Ekonomika i upravlenie: analiz tendentsiy i perspektiv razvitiya. – 2012. – № 2-2. – S. 179-182.
10. Satonina N.N. Klyuchevye pokazateli effektivnosti kak sposob povysheniya effektivnosti raboty personala organizatsii // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomicheskie nauki. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 61-66.