bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Specifics of nano industry as the object for the international economic analysis


Polyntsev I.D.
(about the author)

Polyntsev Ivan D. – Degree-seeking Student, Chair of Global and Regional Economy (Volgograd State University)

Published in:
Creative Economy
– Volume 10, Number 8 (August 2016)

JEL classification: L14, O32, O57

Keywords: comparative analysis, general-purpose technologies, nano technologies, nano-industry


Citation:
Polyntsev I.D. (2016). Specifics of nano industry as the object for the international economic analysis. Creative Economy, 10(8), 921–934. doi: 10.18334/ce.10.8.36504


Share:

Abstract:

The study discloses specific features of nano industry from a perspective of its international comparative analysis. Identification issues of nano technologies and nano industry are determined that are explained by multi-, trans- and interdisciplinarity of the nano science and crucial differences between generations of both nano technologies and nano-containing products made by them. The system character of the nano industry is critically reconsidered, the dynamics of its development in different countries is analyzed. The conclusion is drawn about the need in the special emphasis on the study of institutions and stakeholders at carrying out of the comparative analysis of nano industries in different countries that, if combined with the use of the modified version of functionalism allows to implement the benchmark and reflective functions of comparative studies. The article is interesting to researchers in the field of innovative economics, theory of economic development, economics of nano industry and theory of economic orders.







References:
1. Postanovlenie Pravitelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23.04.2010 № 282 «O natsionalnoy nanotekhnologicheskoy seti».
2. Inshakov O.V., Fesyun A.V. Formirovanie kategorialnogo apparata issledovaniya nanoindustrii // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsialnye tekhnologii. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 26-35.
3. Inshakov O.V., Fesyun A.V. Industriya kak forma utverzhdeniya, rasprostraneniya i gospodstva khozyaystvennogo uklada v ekonomike // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 44-53.
4. Frolov D., Ryzhkin V. Kak postroity nanoindustriyu? (dialog s Richardom Konnolli) // Ekonomist. – 2015. – № 4. – S. 42-51.
5. Markusova V.A. Bionanotekhnologii: bibliometricheskiy analiz po bazam dannyh Science Citation Index i Social Science Citation Index, 1995-2006 gg. // Industriya nanosistem i nanomaterialov. – 2007. – № 1. – S. 23-29.
6. Ultradispersnye poroshki metallov / I. Arsentyeva, B. Ushakov, V. Arsentyev [i dr.] // Natsionalnaya metallurgiya. – 2002. – № 4. – S. 66-71.
7. Frolov D.P. Institutsionalnaya logika tekhnologicheskogo progressa (sluchay nanotekhnologiy) // Journal of Institutional Studies. – 2012. – T. 4. – № 1. – S. 49-64.
8. Zhe L., Lifeng G., Xinghua Z. Definitions, R&D Activities and Industrialization of Biotechnology in China // Asian Biotechnology and Development Review. – 2009. – Vol. 11. – № 2. – R. 29-43.
9. The Lycurgus Cup – A Roman Nanotechnology / I. Freestone, N. Meeks, M. Sax [et al.] // Gold Bulletin. – 2007. – Vol. 40. – № 4. – R. 270-277.
10. Žagar A. Nanotech Cluster and Industry Landscape in Japan [Electronic resource] // EU-Japan. – 2014. – Mode of access: http://www.eu-japan.eu/sites/default/files/publications/docs/nanotechinjapan.pdf
11. Institutsionalnyy analiz nanotekhnologicheskoy «revolyutsii»: sintez ekonomiki i prava: Monografiya / A.O. Inshakova [i dr.]. – SPb: Aleteyya – Gumanitarnaya kniga, 2015. – 524 s.
12. Glossary [Electronic resource] // National Nanotechnology Initiative. – Mode of access: http://www.nano.gov/about-nni/glossary
13. Allhoff F., Lin P. Nanotechnology & Society: Current and Emerging Ethical Issues. – N.Y.: Springer Science & Business Media, 2008. – 300 p.
14. Nanomaterialy i nanotekhnologii / V.M. Anischik, V.E. Borisenko, S.A. Zhdanok [i dr.]. – Minsk: Izdatelskiy tsentr BGU, 2008. – 375 s. – S. 9, 294.
15. The Big Downturn? Nanogeopolitics [Electronic resource] // ETC Group. – 2010. – Mode of access: http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/publication/pdf_file/nano_big4web.pdf
16. Orlova A.A. Sistemnaya kharakteristika nanoindustrii RF // Aktualnye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk. – 2012. – № 24-1. – S. 23-28.
17. Strekalova A.S., Frolov D.P. Sotsialno-ekologicheskaya sistema kak obyekt ekologicheskogo marketinga territoriy: analiz i sintez opredeleniy // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya. – 2015. – № 4. – S. 194-203.
18. Gasman L. Nanotechnology Applications and Markets. – Boston: Artech House, 2006. – 210 r.
19. Kleyner G.B., Kachalov R.M., Nagrudnaya N.B. Sintez strategii klastera na osnove sistemno-integratsionnoy teorii // Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie. – 2008. – № 7. – S. 9-39.
20. Nordmann A. Molecular Disjunctions: Staking Claims at the Nanoscale // Discovering the Nanoscale. – Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004. – 319 r. – R. 51-62.
21. Ostatki magnitotakticheskikh bakteriy v otlozheniyakh sovremennyh ozer – novyy instrument paleogeofiziki / D.K. Nurgaliev, E.V. Utemov, P.G. Yasonov [i dr.] // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennye nauki. – 2009. – T. 151. – № 4. – S. 180-191.
22. Inshakova A.O. Vklad chastnogo prava v razvitie otechestvennoy nanoindustrii: unifikatsionnye tendentsii // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2011. – № 9. – S. 37-44.
23. Chari D., Howard R., Bowe B. Disciplinary identity of nanoscience and nanotechnology research – A study of postgraduate researchers’ experiences // International Journal for Digital Society. – 2012. – Vol. 3. – № 1. – R. 609-616.
24. Yastreb N.A. Konvergentnye tekhnologii: filosofsko-epistemologicheskiy analiz: Monografiya. – Vologda: VoGU, 2014. – 250 s.
25. Gorokhov V.G. Nanotekhnologiya – novaya paradigma nauchno-tekhnicheskoy mysli // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya. – 2008. – № 5. – S. 36-41.
26. Tambovtsev V.L. Perspektivy «ekonomicheskogo imperializma» // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost. – 2008. – № 5. – S. 129-136;
Balatskiy E.V. Za predelami ekonomicheskogo imperializma: preodolenie slozhnosti // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 138-149.
27. Van Den Besselaar P., Heimeriks G. Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary. Concepts and Indicators // Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. – Sydney: University of New South Wales, 2001. – P. 705-716.
28. Bushkovskaya E.A. Fenomen mezhdistsiplinarnosti v zarubezhnyh issledovaniyakh // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2010. – № 330. – S. 152-155.
29. Schummer J. Interdisciplinary Issues in Nanoscale Research // Discovering the Nanoscale. – Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004. – 319 r. – R. 9-20.
30. Frolov D.P. Metodologicheskiy institutsionalizm 2.0: ot institutov – k institutsionalnym konfiguratsiyam // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2016. – № 7. – S. 147-160.
31. The Elgar Companion to Ronald H. Coase. – Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. – 384 p.
32. Patrucco P.P. The emergence of technology systems: knowledge production and distribution in the case of the Emilian plastics district // Cambridge Journal of Economics. – 2005. – Vol. 29. – № 1. – R. 37-56.
33. Malerba F. Innovation and the evolution of industries // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. – 2006. – Vol. 16. – № 1-2. – R. 3-23.