bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Institutional configuration of the regional business environment as a beneficial factor for the entrepreneurship development


Rustam I. Malikov, Konstantin E. Grishin, Diana D. Mukhametova
(about the authors)

Malikov Rustam I. – Doctor of Science, Economics, Professor, Head of the Chair of Economics and Management (Ufa State Petroleum Technological University)

Grishin Konstantin E. – Doctor of Science, Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Chair of Economics and Management (Ufa State Petroleum Technological University)

Mukhametova Diana D. – Candidate of Science, Economics, SENIOR LECTURER of the Chair of Economics and Management (Ufa State Petroleum Technological University)

Published in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– Volume 17, Number 16 (August 2016)

JEL classification: L26, O21, R11

Keywords: business environment, entrepreneurship, institutes, institutional configurations, interaction


Citation:
Rustam I. Malikov, Konstantin E. Grishin, Diana D. Mukhametova (2016). Institutional configuration of the regional business environment as a beneficial factor for the entrepreneurship development. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17(16), 1849–1866. doi: 10.18334/rp.17.16.36489


Share:

Abstract:

The article is dedicated to the theoretical issues of formation of the institutional configuration of business environment as a growth factor of entrepreneurial activities and successful social and economic development of the region. The authors substantiate the institutional structure of business environment that is a unity of formal and informal institutes for interaction of the economic agents with suppliers, consumers, competitors, partners, non-commercial organizations and public authorities. It has been concluded that variability of parameters of the institutional structures of business environment that is observed in different regions allows to the substantiate the approach to the study of institutional configurations of the regional business environment. The article contains new authors’ definition of the institutional configuration of the regional business environment. The method of quantitative assessment of the efficiency of the key (basic) institute of the regional business environment – the institute of interaction between governmental and entrepreneurial structures – has been proposed. Practical trial of this method has been presented using the example of the business environment of the Republic of Bashkortostan. It has been concluded that the key task of the regional entrepreneurship development management in the modern conditions is planning and designing of the institutional configuration of the regional business environment that, in addition, would improve the structure of entrepreneurs’ payments in carrying out of business activities in particular regions.







References:
1. Asaul A.N. Organizatsiya predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti: Uchebnik. – SPb: ANO IPEV, 2009. – 336 s.
2. Baumol U.Dzh. Mikroteoriya innovatsionnogo predprinimatelstva. – M.: Izdatelstvo Instituta Gaydara, 2013. – 432 s. – S. 363.
3. Gorod razvivaet biznes-sredu regiona // Informatsionnyy byulleteny Sankt-Peterburgskoy torgovo-promyshlennoy palaty. – 2008. – № 8. – S. 37.
4. Veblen T. Teoriya prazdnogo klassa. – M.: Progress, 1984. – 368 s. – S. 200.
5. Degtyarev A.N., Malikov R.I., Grishin K.E. Transaktsionnye izderzhki v konture institutsionalnoy konfiguratsii regionalnoy delovoy sredy // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 59-69. – doi: 10.7256/2409-8647.2016.2.19043
6. Degtyarev A.N., Malikov R.I., Grishin K.E. Institutsionalnaya konfiguratsiya regionalnoy delovoy sredy: parametry proektirovaniya // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2014. – № 11. – S. 83-94.
7. Malikov R., Grishin K. Modelirovanie parametrov razvitiya institutsionalnoy konfiguratsii regionalnoy delovoy sredy // Ekonomicheskaya politika. – 2014. – № 6. – S. 171-185.
8. Nort D. Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki. – M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi «Nachala», 1997. – 180 s. – S. 17-18.
9. Orchakov O.A. Sistema faktorov vneshney sredy. Teoriya organizatsii. – M., 2009.
10. Popov E.V. Instituty: Monografiya. – Ekaterinburg: IE UrO RAN, 2015. – 712 s. – S. 28.
11. Prokopenko T.A. Institutsionalizatsiya rossiyskoy delovoy sredy // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. – 2011. – № 8. – S. 87-90.
12. Solodilova N.Z., Malikov R.I., Grishin K.E. Generatsiya blagopriyatnoy institutsionalnoy konfiguratsii regionalnoy delovoy sredy // Ekonomika regiona. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 271-282.
13. Sukharev O.S. Instituty i ekonomicheskoe razvitie: Monografiya. – M.: DeKA, 2005. – 378 s. – S. 44-45.
14. Tambovtsev V.L. Institutsionalnaya dinamika v perekhodnoy ekonomike // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 1998. – № 5. – S. 29-40.
15. Shastitko A. Usloviya i rezultaty formirovaniya institutov // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 1997. – № 3. – S. 67-81. – S. 73-74.
16. Baumol W.J. Enterpreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive // Journal of Political Economy. – 1990. – Vol. 98. – № 5-1. – P. 893-921.
17. Hurwicz L. Implementation and Enforcement // Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representation. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. – 522 p. – P. 51-59.