Citation: Kent Anderson (2014). 73 Things Publishers Do. Scholarly Communication Review, 4(5), 4-10. doi: 10.18334/np45147
Share:
Abstract:
There are many discussions about the publishers’ role in the scholarly communication process. We have two key opinions, one of them is the “pro-publisher” and another opinion is the “contra-publisher”. This list of pointswas written to explain the publishers’ role in the scholarly communication process and their influence on scholars. The author describes the key stages of publishing process organization and characterizes them with fitness cycle training program criteria