bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Estimation of appeal of machine-building complex enterprises’ innovative projects of the Republic of Dagestan


Natalyya Kezinova, Yuriy Foteev, Liliya Saakova
(about the authors)

Kezinova Natalyya Sedredinovna – Postgraduate Chair of Enterprise Economy, Dagestan State Institute of National Economy under Government of the Republic of Dagestan

Foteev Yuriy Vladimirovich – Applicant, Institute of Economics, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Financial Director, Medisorb-group, Ltd.

Saakova Liliya Valerianovna – Applicant, Chair of Marketing Saint-Petersburg State University of Economy and Finance

Published in:
Creative Economy
– № 8 / August, 2011



Keywords: estimation, innovations, modernization, projects


Citation:
Natalyya Kezinova, Yuriy Foteev, Liliya Saakova (2011). Estimation of appeal of machine-building complex enterprises’ innovative projects of the Republic of Dagestan. Creative Economy, 5(8), 66-70. — url: http://bgscience.ru/com/lib/569


Share:

Abstract:

The article considers questions of intensification of Russian economy modernization process by realization of innovative projects. The author defines perspective directions of development of machine-building complex leading enterprises in the Republic of Dagestan, and the most significant factors which should be considered when choosing and realizing innovative projects.







References:
1. Balabanov V.S. Innovatsionnyy menedzhment : uchebnoe posobie / V.S. Balabanov, M.N. Dudin, N.V. Lyasnikov. – M. : AP «Nauka i obrazovanie», 2008.
2. Modernizatsiya ekonomiki na osnove tekhnologicheskikh innovatsiy / A.N. Asaul [i dr.] – SPb. : ANO «IPEV», 2008.
3. Freeman C. and Soete L. The Economics of Industrial Innovation / London: Pinter, 1997.
4. Freel M., Sectoral Patterns of Small Firms Innovation, Networking and Proximity, Research Policy 32(5):751 – 70, 2003; and Rogers M. Networks, Firm Size and Innovation, Small Business Economics 22 (2): 141 – 53. 2006.