bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu
  • BIBLIO-GLOBUS
    • About
  • Journals
    • Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
    • Creative Economy
    • Scholarly Communication Review
    • Russian Journal of Retail Management
    • Leadership and Management
    • Public-Private Partnership
    • Global Markets and Financial Engineering
    • Russian Journal of Housing Research
    • Food Policy and Security
    • Russian Journal of Labor Economics
    • Russian Journal of Innovation Economics
    • Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law
    • Russian Journal of Humanistic Psychology
  • BIBLIO-GLOBUS fiction

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Business team formation and fault-lines in family business


Dmitriy Volkov
(about the author)

Volkov Dmitriy Anatolyevich – Candidate of Economical Sci., DBA program Graduate, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public administration

Published in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– № 23 / December, 2013



Keywords: business team, family business, fault-lines


Citation:
Dmitriy Volkov (2013). Business team formation and fault-lines in family business. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 14(23), 127-134. — url: http://bgscience.ru/com/lib/4466


Share:

Abstract:

This article describes specific features of family business development by means of business team formation and determines factors on effective development of management teams in family business depends.








References:
1. Katz, J.A., Aldrich, H.E., Welbourne, T.M., & Williams, P.M. (2000). Guest editor»s comments – Special issue on human resource management and the SME: Toward a new synthesis. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 25(1). – r. 7–10.
2. Tansky, J.W. & Heneman, R. (2003). Guest editor's note: Introduction to the special issue on human resource management in SMEs: A call for more research. – Human Resource Management. – 42. – r. 299–302.
3. Schjoedt, L. & Shaver, K.G. (2007). Deciding on an entrepreneurial career: A test of the pull and push hypotheses using the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics data. – Entrepreneurship Theoryand Practice. – 31. – r. 733–752
4. Monsen, E. & Boss, R.W. (2009). The impact of strategic entrepreneurship inside the organization: Examining job stress and employee retention. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 33. – r. 71–104
5. Moroz, P.W. & Hindle, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a process: Toward harmonizing multiple perspectives. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 36. – r. 781–818.
6. Morris, M.H., Kuratko, D.F., Schindehutte, M., & Spivack, A.J. (2012). Framing the entrepreneurial experience. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 36. – r. 11–40.
7. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., & Bergiel, E.B. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 33. – r. 355–372.
8. Cruz, A.D., Howorth, C., & Hamilton, E. (2013). Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 37(1). – r. 17–46.
9. Lim, J.Y.-K., Busenitz, L.W., & Chidambaram, L. (2013). New venture teams and the quality of business opportunities identified: Faultlines between subgroups of founders and investors. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 37(1). – r. 47–67
10. Stewart, A. & Hitt, M.A. (2012). Why can't a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. – Family Business Review. – 25. – r. 58–86.
11. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Pearson, A.W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 36. – r. 267–293.
12. Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., & Chirico, F. (2013). Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: Exploring non-linear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
13. Kellermanns, F.W., Floyd, S., Pearson, A.W., & Spencer, B. (2008). The contingent effect of constructive con-frontation on the relationship between shared mental models and decision quality. – Journal of Organizational Behavior. – 29. – r. 119–137.
14. Hambrick, D.C. & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. – Academy of Management Review. – 9. – r. 193–207.
15. Schjoedt, L. & Kraus, S. (2009). Entrepreneurial teams: Definition and performance factors. – Management Research News. – 32. – r. 513–524.
16. Wales, W., Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011). The organizational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation. – Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 35. – r. 895–923.
17. Rusakova Z.K., Lavrentyeva I.V. Semeynyy biznes i razvitie reproduktivnoy ekonomiki // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. – 2011. – № 1 Vyp. 1 (175). – c. 10–15. – http://www.creativeconomy.ru/articles/11319/.

Tel : +7 495 649 6241

Fax : +7 800 3331538

E-mail : bgscience@idbg.ru

Address : RUSSIA, 101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya st. 13-2

BIBLIO-GLOBUS Science

BIBLIO-GLOBUS Science - one of the leading science publishers in Russia.

Read More
Other sites
  • BIBLIO-GLOBUS fiction
  • BIBLIO-GLOBUS bookstore
  • National Science Publishing Association (NATSPA)
© 2016 BIBLIO-GLOBUS Science (BIBLIO-GLOBUS Publishing House). All Rights Reserved