Ignatiy TelekhovPublished in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– № 6 / March, 2013



Keywords: economic evaluation of projects, investment projects, project management, real options, risk management


Share:

Abstract:

The use of real option valuation models can give inaccurate and even incorrect results due to arising problems of using financial options models. The article focuses on analyzing this problems and inaccuracies that they can produce.

---

References:
1. Damodaran A. Investitsionnaya otsenka: Instrumenty i metody otsenki lyubyh aktivov; Per. s angl. – M.: Alpina Biznes Buks, 2011. – 1341 s.
2. Black F., Scholes M. The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities // The Journal of Political Economy 1973. – Vol. 81, No. 3. May-Jun pp. 637-654
3. Borison A. Real Options Analysis: Where Are the Emperor’s Clothes? // Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 2005. – Volume 17 Number 2 (Spring) pp. 17-31
4.Cox J.C., Ross S.A., Rubinstein M. Option pricing: A simplified approach // Journal of Financial Economics 1979. – Volume 7, Issue 3, (September) pp. 229-263
5. Ho S.-H., Liao S.-H. A fuzzy real option approach for investment project valuation // Expert Systems with Applications 2011. – No. 38 pp. 15296–15302
6. Hubalek F., Schachermayer W. The Limitations of No-Arbitrage Arguments for Real Options // International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Finance 2001. – Vol. 4, No.2 pp. 361–373.
7. Leland H.E. Option Pricing and Replication With Transactions Costs // Journal of Finance 1985. – Vol. XL, No. 5 (December) pp. 1283–1301.