Konstantin MikhaylovPublished in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– № 8-2 / August, 2011



Keywords: complex and simple systems, economic objects, external, forecasting models, internal, state of object


Share:

Abstract:

The article considers factors affecting the quality of forecasting the economic state of object which is associated with the features of its behavior. The author analyzes and identifies the features of building forecasting models for economic objects, which show the need to describe the feedback between the process of forecasting and the external environment.

---

References:
1. Kolpakov V.M. Teoriya i praktika prinyatiya upravlencheskikh resheniy. – K.: MAUP, 2004. – 504 s.
2. Laslo E. Makrosdvig (K ustoychivosti mira kursom peremen) / Per. s angl. Yu.A. Danilova. – M.: Taydeks Ko, 2004. – 207 s.
3. Marenkov N.L. Sistema Forsayt kak kompleksnyy instrument strategicheskogo upravleniya innovatsionnym razvitiem ekonomiki Rossii: avtoreferat diss. … doktora ekonomicheskikh nauk: 08.00.01, 08.00.05. – M., 2008. – 50 s.
4. Moiseev N.N. Izbrannye trudy (v 2-kh tomakh). T.2. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya globalnyh problem. – M.: Taydeks Ko, 2003. – 64 s.
5. Melnikov O.N. Perspektivy razvitiya sistem upravleniya biznesom // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. – 2000. – S. 87–93.
6. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Pryadok iz khaosa. Novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2000. – 132 s.
7. Fisher S., Dornbush R., Shmalenzi R. Ekonomika: per. s angl. so 2-go izd. – M.: Delo, 2002. – 864 s.
8. Fatkhutdinov R.A. Razrabotka upravlencheskogo resheniya. – M.: 1997. – 208 s.