bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Enterprise’s Project Activity and the Intellectual Capital of the Society


Dzhomart Aliev
(about the author)

Aliev Dzhomart Fazylovich –

Published in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– № 5-2 / May, 2011



Keywords: economic instruments, industrys development, innovative activities, project management, project managers


Citation:
Dzhomart Aliev (2011). Enterprise’s Project Activity and the Intellectual Capital of the Society. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 12(5), 28-32. — url: http://bgscience.ru/com/lib/2968


Share:

Abstract:

Enterprise’s project activity today is an innovation and investment methodology recognized in all developed countries. During implementation of such projects there is a need for specialists of a new profile, so-called project managers. According to the author, a class of such highly skilled professionals is being formed automatically when the share of non-standard (innovation) activities prevails over routine work. In this context, the author believes that the criterion of the project development efficiency may become the degree of increase in the intellectual capital of the society, which appears as a result of the project realization and is manifested as an increase in the expertise, knowledge and skills of employees.







References:
1. Grime J.P. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. – Chichester: W and S, 1979. – 222 p.
2. Martin J. Enterprise Engineering. The Key to Corporate Survival. – V.1 – V – UK: Savant Institute, 1994. – P. 24–26.
3. Commercializing High Technology: East and West. – Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1997.
4. Roberts E.B. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond. – Oxford University Press, New York, 1991, pp. 124–159.
5. Polterovich V., Popov V. Appropriate Economic Policies at Different Stages of Development [Elektronnyy resurs]. – http://www.nes.ru/english/research/pdf/2005/PopovPolterovich.doc. 2005.
6. Heylin M. Ag biotech’s promise clouded by consumer fear // Chem.and Eng. News. – 1999. v.77, №9. – P.73–82.
7. MacMillan, I.C, Siegel, R. and Subbanarasimha, P. N. (1985). «Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals», Journal of Business Venturing, v. 1, Winter, pp. 119–128.
8. Datta, D.K. (1988), «International joint ventures: A framework for analysis Journal of General Management», v. 14, n. 2, Winter, pp. 78–91.
9. Kolbachev E.B. Sotsialnaya effektivnosty ekonomicheskikh proektov modernizatsii i tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya // Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiyskogo gos. tekhn. un-ta (NPI). – Seriya «Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie nauki», 2008. – S. 8–17.