bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Peculiarities of the structure of the innovation process of Russian industrial enterprises


Yuliya Balycheva, Boris Panin
(about the authors)

Balycheva Yuliya Evgenyevna – Research scientist, Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Panin Boris Aleksandrovich – Postgraduate, Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences

Published in:
Creative Economy
– № 9 / September, 2014



Keywords: business management, development strategy, innovation, innovation process, innovative behavior, size class, the elementary process


Citation:
Yuliya Balycheva, Boris Panin (2014). Peculiarities of the structure of the innovation process of Russian industrial enterprises. Creative Economy, 8(9), 31-42. — url: http://bgscience.ru/com/lib/1293


Share:

Abstract:

The aim of this study is to analyze the structure of the innovation process of Russian companies, depending on factors such as belonging of a company to the size class. The main stages of innovation are specified for each size class, implemented basic innovative processes are determined for the entire study period.







References:
1. Balycheva Yu.E. Sposob vyyavleniya tipov innovatsionnoy aktivnosti predpriyatiy. Upravlenie innovatsiyami, 2013: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 18–20 noyabrya 2013 g. / Pod red. R.M. Nizhegorodtseva.
2. Barkun J., Aronson J., Feldman L., Maddern G., Strasberg S. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. The Lancet, 2009.Volume 374, Issue 9695, 26 September–2 October 2009.
3. Bernstein, B., Singh, P.J. An integrated innovation process model based on practices of Australian biotechnology firms. 2006.Technovation 26 (5–6).
4. Cantisani, A. Technological innovation process revisited. 2006. Technovation 26 (11).
5. Chen, K., Guan, J. Mapping the innovation production process from accumulate advantage to economic outcomes: a path modeling approach. 2011. Technovation 31.
6. Dosi G. Opportunities, Incentives and the Collective Patterns of Technological Change. 1997. Econ. J., 107.
7. Hansen, M.T., Birkinshaw, J. The innovation value chain. 2007. Harvard BusinessReview 85 (July).
8. Kline, S., Rosenberg, N. An overview of innovation. In R. Landau, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy – Harnessing technology for economicgrowth: 275–304.1986. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
9. Kostas, G. Innovation process. Make sense using systems thinking. 2006. Technovation 26 (11).
10. Pavitt, K. «Innovation Processes», in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation eds. R. R. Nelson, D. C. Mowery and J. Fagerberg, 2006. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Perez C. Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems, Futures, 1983. Volume 15, Issue 5, October 1983, Pages.
12. Roper, S., Dub, J., Loveb, J.H. Modeling the innovation value chain. 2008. Research Policy 37(6–7).
13. Sekhar J.A., Dismukes J. Generic innovation dynamics across the industrial technology life cycle: platform equation modeling of invention and innovation activity, 2009. Technol Forecast Soc. Change 76 (1) 192–203.
14. Thrane S., Blaabjerg S., Moller R. Innovative path dependence: Making sense of product and service innovation in path dependent innovation processes, 2010. Research Policy, Volume 39, Issue 7, September 2010, Pages.
15. Verloop J. 2 – The Innovation Bridge, Success in Innovation, 2013.