Gorochnaya V.V., Mikhaylov A.S., Mikhaylova A.A.Published in:
Russian Journal of Innovation Economics
– Volume 10, Number 1 (January-March 2020)

JEL classification: O31, O32, O33, R13

Keywords: cross-border region, economic self-organization, innovative security, Kaliningrad Region, Rostov region


Share:

Abstract:

The research is aimed at developing and testing a dynamic approach to the survey and assessment of innovation security of regions with an emphasis on the Western cross-border regions of Russia. The object of the study was the Rostov and Kaliningrad regions. A review of approaches to the study of innovative security in the region and its theoretical conceptualization from the perspective of the theory of chaos and self-organization of complex systems. A special contribution of the authors to the study of the problem of assessment and monitoring of innovation security in the region is the justification of the need to use a dynamic approach based on the comparison of dynamic indicators for successive stages of the cycle of innovation and technological reproduction, taking into account lag inertia. The theoretical positions are verified using empirical material that characterizes the dynamics of innovative development of the Western cross-border regions of Russia as a problem area experiencing contradictory trends in the complicated conditions of interaction in the "Russia - West" system. The analysis of dynamic series for the following groups of indicators: primary conditions for conducting scientific and innovative activities, regional patenting market, generation of advanced production technologies and introduction of innovations in the production process. The results of the study revealed the specifics of innovative security in the Rostov and Kaliningrad regions, the factors of its provision in the conditions of increased external risks. Self-organizing mechanisms of resistance of regional reproduction in relation to risk factors are defined. The proposed theoretical and methodological approaches can be applied in the practice of assessing and monitoring the innovation security of other subjects of Russia, as well as in the process of further study of its factors in the current conditions of geo-economic instability.

---

References:
Bagaryakov A.V. (2012). Innovatsionnaya bezopasnost v sisteme ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona [Innovational security in the system of a region's economic security]. Economy of the region. (2). 302-305. (in Russian).
Barchuk I.D., Maslennikova O.A. (2013). Sovremennye aspekty bezopasnosti i aktivizatsii innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti: problemy i resheniya [Modern aspects of security and intensification of innovation activities: problems and solutions]. Izvestiya OGAU. (1(39)). 122-125. (in Russian).
Druzhinin A.G., Gorochnya V.V., Fedorov G.M., Dets I.A., Mikhaylov A.S. (2018). Large business localization as economic development factor of coastal territories SGEM 2018 Conference Proceedings. (5(4.1)). 59-67.
Fernandes S., Cesário M., Castela G. (2018). Modern innovation challenges to firms and cities: The case of Portugal Journal of Technology Management and Innovation. (13). 33-42.
Golova I.M., Sukhovey A.F. (2017). Formirovanie innovatsionnoy sostavlyayushchey ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona [Development of Innovative Component for the Region’s Economic Security]. Economy of the region. (13(4)). 1251-1263. (in Russian).
Golova I.M., Sukhovey A.F., Nikulina N.L. (2017). Problemy povysheniya innovatsionnoy ustoychivosti regionalnogo razvitiya [Problems of Increasing the Regional Development Innovative Sustainability]. Economy of the region. (13(1)). 308-318. (in Russian).
Gorochnaya V.V. (2018). Turbulentnost v geoekonomike: metodicheskiy podkhod k modelirovaniyu vozdeystviya na ekonomicheskuyu dinamiku porubezhnogo regiona [Turbulence in geo-economics: methodical approach to modeling the impact on the economic dynamics of a border region]. Sustainable Development Economics. (4(36)). 136-142. (in Russian).
Gorochnaya V.V., Druzhinin A.G. (2019). Indikatsiya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti prigranichnogo regiona v usloviyakh geoekonomicheskoy turbulentnosti (na primere rostovskoy oblasti) [Indication of the economic security of the border region in terms of geo-economic turbulence (on the example of Rostov region)]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipalnoe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski. (1). 96-106. (in Russian).
Griffith R., Redding S., Reenen J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries Review of Economics and Statistics. (86(4)). 883-895.
Guellec D., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. (66(3)). 353-378.
Hou J., Chen J., Song H., Wang G. (2018). Are non-R & D innovation activities actually effective for innovation sustainability? Empirical study from Chinese high-tech industry Sustainability. (11(1)).
Kormishkin E.D., Sausheva O.S. (2013). Innovatsionnaya bezopasnost kak uslovie effektivnogo funktsionirovaniya regionalnoy innovatsionnoy sistemy [Innovative security as a condition for the effective functioning of the regional innovation system]. Regional Economics: Theory and Pactice. (34(313)). 2-8. (in Russian).
Kuklin A.A., Bagaryakov AV., Nikulina N.L., Boyarskikh A.I. (2013). Metodika diagnostiki innovatsionnoy bezopasnosti regiona [The method of diagnostics of the innovation security of the region] (in Russian).
Mikhaylov A.S., Mikhaylova A.A., Kuznetsova T.Yu. (2018). Coastalization effect and spatial divergence: segregation of European regions Ocean & Coastal Management. (161). 57-65.
Mikhaylov A.S., Mikhaylova A.A., Savchina O.V. (2018). Innovation security of cross-border innovative milieus Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. (6(2)). 754-766.
Mikhaylova A.A. (2019). Innovatsionnaya bezopasnost v fokuse uchyonyh stran postsovetskogo prostranstva [Innovative security in the focus of scientists of the former Soviet Union] (in Russian).
Mikhaylova A.A. (2016). The role of human capital in providing innovation security of the region Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. (11(8)). 1724-1735.
Mikhaylova A.A. (2018). Innovatsionnaya bezopasnost regiona: nauchnaya konstruktsiya ili politicheskaya neobkhodimost? [Innovation security of region: scientific construct or political necessity?]. Innovations. (231(1)). 79-86. (in Russian).
Nikolaenko A.I. (2013). Innovationsafety in the evolutional development of economic system Bulletin of Donetsk National University. Series C: Economics and Law. (2). 110-113.
Nikolina Yu.P. (2018). Innovatsionnaya bezopasnost v sisteme natsionalnoy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti: nauchno-metodicheskiy aspekt [Innovative safety in system national economic security: scientific and methodical aspect]. Economics and management: problems, solutions (Ekonomika i upravleniye: problemy, resheniya nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal). (1). 13-19. (in Russian).
Omelyanenko V. (2018). Kontseptualizatsiya strategicheskoy innovatsionnoy bezopasnosti strany [Innovative conceptualization of strategic security of the country]. Tekhnologicheskiy audit i rezervy proizvodstva. (5(41)). 36-42. (in Russian).
Pratama B. (2018). Indonesian legal framework to support innovation sustainability IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. (126(1)).
Sakovich V.A., Brovka G.M. (2016). Innovatsionnaya bezopasnost: nekotorye aspekty teorii,metodologii, praktiki [Innovative security: some aspects of theory,methodology, practice] (in Russian).
Smith, N., Thomas E. (2017). Regional conditions and innovation in Russia: the impact of foreign direct investment and absorptive capacity Regional Studies. (51(9)). 1412-1428.
Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели 2018. Официальный портал Федеральной службы государственной статистики. (in Russian). Retrieved October 1, 2019, from http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1138623506156