bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu
  • BIBLIO-GLOBUS
    • About
  • Journals
    • Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
    • Creative Economy
    • Scholarly Communication Review
    • Russian Journal of Retail Management
    • Leadership and Management
    • Public-Private Partnership
    • Global Markets and Financial Engineering
    • Russian Journal of Housing Research
    • Food Policy and Security
    • Russian Journal of Labor Economics
    • Russian Journal of Innovation Economics
    • Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law
    • Russian Journal of Humanistic Psychology
  • BIBLIO-GLOBUS fiction

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Типы цифрового неравенства


Sukharev M.V.
(about the author)

Sukharev Mikhail Valentinovich – (Karelian Research Centre of the RAS)

Published in:
Creative Economy
– Volume 13, Number 12 (December 2019)

JEL classification: J24, O15, O31, O32

Keywords: culture, digital economy, digital inequality, end-to-end technologies, human capital, information literacy, innovation, social capital


Citation:
Sukharev M.V. (2019). Типы цифрового неравенства. Creative Economy, 13(12) doi: 10.18334/ce.13.12.41524


Share:

Abstract:

The article deals with the problem of creating a typology of varieties of digital inequality as a phenomenon of the digital economy, leading to an increase in social and economic differentiation of the population. An analogy is drawn between the modern digitalization of society and the economy and the creation and expansion of writing. The article substantiates the position that, like writing, digitalization is a end-to-end social technology that penetrates into all types of economic activity. Based on the review of the scientific literature on digital inequality, the types of digital inequality are distinguished. The typology of digital inequality is proposed as an object for further discussion.








References:
Arnold R. Lorenzo, Blessie U. Lorenzo (2013). Bridging the Digital Divide among Public High School Teachers: An Adopt-a-school Experience Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 103 190-199. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.326.
Dean Riddlesden, Alex D. Singleton (2014). Broadband speed equity: A new digital divide? Applied Geography. 52 25-33.
Khalid, Md. Saifuddin, Pedersen, Mette Jun Lykkegaard (2016). Digital exclusion in higher education contexts: A systematic literature review Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.094.
Kuersten A. (2017). The Arctic Digital Divide Arctic Summer College Yearbook. 92-105. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66459-0_8.
Leanne Townsend, Claire Wallace, Gorry Fairhurst (2017). Broadband and the creative industries in rural Scotland Journal of Rural Studies. 54 451-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.001.
Liao Chin, Chang Hsueh-Sheng (2010). Explore the influences to Taiwan students’ information literacy with the Urban-rural differences from the perspective of globalization Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2 (2). 3866-3870. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.606.
Luman N. (2005). Media kommunikatsii [Media communications] M.: Izdatelstvo “Logos. (in Russian).
Michelle Connolly, Clement Lee, Renhao Tan. (2017). The Digital Divide and Other Economic Considerations for Network Neutrality Review of Industrial Organization. 50 (4). 537-554. doi: 10.1007/s11151-016-9554-8.
Mirjana Pejiü Bach, Jovana Zoroja, Vesna Bosilj Vukšiü (2013). Determinants of firms’ digital divide: A review of recent research Procedia Technology. 9 120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.013.
Nejc M. Jakopin (2009). Telecommunication Markets: Drivers and Impediments Physica Verlag.
Popper K.R. (2002). Obektivnoe znanie. Evolyutsionnyy podkhod [Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach] M.: Editorial URSS. (in Russian).
Ragnedda M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital Telematics and Informatics. 35 2366-2375.
Ragnedda M., Kreitem H. (2018). The Three Levels of Digital Divide in East EU Countries. 1. 10.30547 World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies. 1 (4). 5-26. doi: 10.30547/worldofmedia.4.2018.1.
Sarah Rotz, Evan Gravely, Ian Mosby et. al. (2019). Automated pastures and the digital divide: How agricultural technologies are shaping labour and rural communities Journal of Rural Studies. 68 112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023.
Silva M., Correia S. (2014). ActiveBrain: Online Social Platform for Active and Healthy Ageing Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion. 38-45.
Songphan Choemprayong (2006). Closing Digital Divides: The United States’ Policies Libri. 56 201-212.
Sora Park (2017). Digital Capital UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Veeraporn Siddoo, Jinda Sawattawee, Worawit Janchai, Orawit Thinnukool (2019). An exploratory study of digital workforce competency in Thailand Heliyon. 5 (5). e01723. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01723.
Миронов В.В. Письменность и книгопечатание как фундамент классической культурыЭлектронное научное издание Альманах Пространство и Время. Retrieved from https://new.istina.msu.ru/publications/article/17139565/

Tel : +7 495 649 6241

Fax : +7 800 3331538

E-mail : bgscience@idbg.ru

Address : RUSSIA, 101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya st. 13-2

BIBLIO-GLOBUS Science

BIBLIO-GLOBUS Science - one of the leading science publishers in Russia.

Read More
Other sites
  • BIBLIO-GLOBUS fiction
  • BIBLIO-GLOBUS bookstore
  • National Science Publishing Association (NATSPA)
© 2016 BIBLIO-GLOBUS Science (BIBLIO-GLOBUS Publishing House). All Rights Reserved