Solovev D.B., Kuzora S.S.Published in:
Creative Economy
– Volume 13, Number 4 (April 2019)

JEL classification: O31, O32, O33

Keywords: assessment of innovation, forecasting of innovative activity, innovative processes, mathematical modeling


Share:

Abstract:

The article deals with mathematical modeling as a tool that can justify management decisions in innovation, its advantages and disadvantages of application in the modern economy. On the basis of the existing problems of organization of innovative activities, it is proposed to focus on campaigning potential participants. We determined the ratio of criterion/weight which is determined by the efficiency of agitation. A study on the use of mathematical modeling to predict the number of participants to attract innovative detail was conducted. The successful experience of testing the developed mathematical model at the events of the Far Eastern representative office of the SKOLKOVO Foundation is demonstrated. The study may be of interest to specialists involved in the organization of innovation.

---

References:
Andina D., Fukushima K. (2018). Neuroengineering: from Neurosciences to Computations International Journal of Neural Systems. 28 (5). doi: 10.1142/s0129065718030016.
Bonazzi F., Zilber M. (2014). Innovation and business model: a case study about integration of innovation funnel and business model canvas Review of business management. 16 (53). 616-637.
Bris G., Yannou B., Attias D. (2013). A categorization of innovation funnels of companies as a way to better make conscious agility and permeability Conference Paper.
Coenen T., Ranaivoson H., Ballon P. (2010). Tool support for the Open Business Model Innovative funnel Conference Paper. (1).
Dezhina I.G., Kiseleva V.V. (2008). Institut ekonomiki perekhodnogo perioda [Institute for the economy in transition]. Gosudarstvo, nauka i biznes v innovatsionnoy sisteme Rossii. (in Russian).
Dynkin A.A., Ivanova N.I. i dr. (2004). Innovatsionnaya ekonomika [Innovative economy] M.: Nauka. (in Russian).
Gorkavyy M.A., Gorkavyy A.I. (2016). Intellektualnye sistemy v zadachakh upravleniya tekhnicheskimi i organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskimi protsessami [Intelligent systems in control problems in technical, organizational, and technological processes] Komsomolsk-on-Amur: FGBOU VO «KnAGTU». (in Russian).
Hakkarainen K. (2014). The innovation funnel fallacy International Journal of Innovation Science. 6
Itskovits G.V. (2011). Model troynoy spirali [The triple helix model]. Innovatsionnaya Rossiya. (4). (in Russian).
Kozlova Zh.M. (2011). Problemy stanovleniya natsionalnoy innovatsionnoy sistemy v Rossii [Problems of formation of national innovative system in Russia]. Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. (2(20)). 17-21. (in Russian).
Kuznetsov V.V., Kraynyukov A N. (2007). Kontseptsii innovatsionnogo razvitiya na baze sistemnogo podkhoda [The concept of innovative development on the basis of the system approach]. Innovation activity. (4). (in Russian).
Laecio Carvalho de Barros, Rodney C.B., Weldon Lodwick. (2016). Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing
Leonenkov A.V. (2005). Nechetkoe modelirovanie v srede MATLAB i fuzzyTECH [Fuzzy modeling in MATLAB and fuzzyTECH] SPb.: BKhV-Peterburg. (in Russian).
Melnikov O.N., Shuvalov V.N. (2009). Innovatsionnaya aktivnost kak faktor povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiya [Innovative activity as factor of increase of competitiveness of the enterprise]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. (9). (in Russian).
Schepina I.N. (2012). Innovatsionnaya deyatelnost na regionalnom urovne : tipy povedeniya regionov i ikh ustoychivost [Innovative activities at the regional level : the behavior of regions and their stability] Voronezh: Izdatelsko-poligraficheskiy tsentr Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universitet. (in Russian).
Sergeev V.M., Alekseenkova E.S., Nechaev V.D. (2008). Tipologiya modeley innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Typology of models of innovative development]. Politia: analysis. chronicle. forecast (journal of political philosophy and sociology of politics). (4). 6-22. (in Russian).
Shatunova Yu.V. (2008). Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti [State regulation of innovation activities] KGSKhA im.prof. I. I. Ivanova. (in Russian).
Shterenzon V.A. (2010). Modelirovanie tekhnologicheskikh protsessov [Modeling of technological processes] Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ros. gos. prof.-ped. un-ta. (in Russian).
Sodiya A.S., Onashoga S.A., Oladunjoye B.A. (2007). Threat modeling using fuzzy logic paradigm Informing Science. (4).
Solovev D.B., Kuzora S.S., Merkusheva A E. (2018). Ispolzovanie algoritmov nechetkogo vyvoda dlya predvaritelnoy otsenki uchastnikov pri klasternom podkhode [Use of algorithms of an indistinct conclusion for preliminary estimate of participants at cluster approach]. Innovations. (5(235)). 77-81. (in Russian).
Solovev D.B., Kuzora S.S., Merkusheva A.E. (2018). Matematicheskaya model otsenki effektivnosti innovatsionnogo khaba [The mathematical model of evaluating the effectiveness of the innovation hub]. Economics and management: problems, solutions (Ekonomika i upravleniye: problemy, resheniya nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal). 1 (3). 3-10. (in Russian).
Zade L. (1976). Ponyatie lingvisticheskoy peremennoy i ego primenenie k prinyatiyu priblizhennyh resheniy [The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to the adoption of approximate solutions] M.: Mir. (in Russian).
Zverev A.V. (2008). Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti [The state support of innovative activities]. Bulletin of the Financial University. (4). (in Russian).
Дальневосточное представительство фонда «Сколково». (in Russian). Retrieved from http://sk.ru/foundation/fareast
Дальневосточный федеральный университет (ДВФУ). (in Russian). Retrieved from https://www.dvfu.ru