Shilova N.P.Published in:
Russian Journal of Humanistic Psychology
– Volume 5, Number 2 (April-June 2018)



Keywords: educational interests, educational space, high school, stability of educational interests, youth


Share:

Abstract:

The development of modern technologies and social structure has changed the approach to professional choice, which is of great importance for the young people. Young men and women should not only choose their future profession, but also learn to make professional choices constantly during their lives, based on their own, including educational interests. The article deals with the theoretical background to the problems of youth in modern contexts, as well as presents the results and key findings of the study on the relationship between the high stability of the choice of subjects of education and a sense of self-control over their lives and the independence of their choice. The findings of the study are based on data obtained from a sample of more than six hundred subjects from 13 years to 21 years. It is shown that the experience regarding the situation of choice and the result of the choice made in adolescence, as well as how life corresponds to the desires of the individual, demonstrates the level of his responsibility for the choice made, and therefore the success of solving problems of adolescence.

Highlights:

1.The explosive growth of technology has led to the fact that today's students do not imagine a profession that can become ther own for life, can not determine for themselves what forms of development of new content are most acceptable.
2. Youth is experienced positively if there is an opportunity to form stable educational interests, and there is a possibility of a choice in own educational space.

---

References:
Arnett J.J. (2001). Conceptions of transition to adulthood: perspectives from adolescence through midlife Journal of Adult Development. 8 (2). 133-143.
Arnett J.J. (2010). High Hopes in a Grim World: Emerging Adults' Views of their Futures and "Generation X" Youth & Society. (31(3)). 267-286.
Bozhovich L.S. (1968). Lichnost i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood] M.: «Prosveschenie». (in Russian).
Davydov V.V. (2000). Vidy obscheniya v obuchenii: Logiko-psikhologicheskie problemy postroeniya uchebnyh predmetov [Types of communication in training: Logical and psychological problems of subjects composing] M.: Pedagogicheskie obschestvo Rossii. (in Russian).
Dusavitskiy A.K. (1996). Razvitie lichnosti v uchebnoy deyatelnosti [Personal development in educational activities] M.: «Dom pedagogiki». (in Russian).
Dyui Dzh. (2000). Demokratiya i obrazovanie [Democracy and education] M.: Pedagogika – Press. (in Russian).
Erikson E. (1996). Identichnost: yunost i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis] M.: Progress. (in Russian).
Leontev D.A. (2002). Lichnostnyy potentsial kak osnova determinatsii [Personal potential as the basis of determination] Scientific notes of the Department of General psychology of Lomonosov Moscow State University. 56-65. (in Russian).
Leontev D.A., Mandrikova E.Yu., Fam A.Kh. (2007). Razrabotka metodiki diagnostiki protsessualnoy storony vybora [The development of diagnostic techniques of procedure choice side]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. (6). 4-25. (in Russian).
Markova A.K., Matis T.A., Orlov A.B. (1990). Formirovanie motivatsii ucheniya [Formation of motivation of the teaching] M.: Prosveschenie. (in Russian).
Pavlenko E.S. (2014). «Vzroslyy» kak kategoriya v rabote po postroeniyu zhiznennogo puti molodezhyu [Adult” as a category for young people building their life]. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes. (6(124)). 141-152. (in Russian). doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2014.6.11 .
Polivanova K.N. (2016). Detstvo v menyayuschemsya mire [Childhood in a changing world]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya. 5 (2). 5-10. (in Russian). doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2016050201.
Popov D.S., Tyumeneva Yu.A., Kuzmina Yu.V. (2012). Sovremennye obrazovatelnye traektorii shkolnikov i studentov [Modern educational trajectories of schoolchildren and students]. Sociological Studies (Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia). (2). 135-142. (in Russian).
Sobkin V.S., Abrosimova Z.B., Adamchuk D.V., Baranova E.V. (2005). Podrostok: normy, riski, deviatsii. Trudy o sotsiologii obrazovaniya [Teenager: norms, risks, deviation. Works on the sociology of education] M.: Tsentr sotsiologii obrazovaniya RAO. (in Russian).
Vasileva N.P., Kuzhabekova M.M., Nikitina E.V., Khasan B.I. (2005). Issledovanie dinamiki i osobennostey detskikh obrazovatelnyh interesov [Research of dynamics and features of children's educational interests] Pedagogy of development: educational interests and their subjects. 158-167. (in Russian).
Vasileva N.P., Nikitina E.V., Khasan B.I. (2005). Chetyre chetverti [Four quarters] Krasnodar: Krasnoyarskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. (in Russian).