Irina V. ZiminaPublished in:
Creative Economy
– Volume 10, Number 11 (November 2016)

JEL classification: D85, I23, L14, O30

Keywords: network approach, ongoing education, scientific and industrial educational network, triple helix


Share:

Abstract:

Scientific development of the triple helix model has led to the increased role of the scientific and educational environment in the innovative development intensification. Alongside this, development of information and communication technologies and the network economy causes the need to change the approach to the nature of interaction between participants of the triple helix model: universities, authorities and the business. A shift to horizontal relationships can be observed. In this regard, the author's interpretation of the concept of the “scientific and industrial educational network” formulated on the basis of the analysis of the existing scientific approaches to the study of network interactions in the education has been proposed. The author represents the concept of interactions and the role of main triple helix actors within functioning of the scientific and industrial educational network. Within the study, statistics of educational indices has been analyzed, as well as their influence on the innovative development. The character of interconnection between indices has been substantiated.

---

References:
1. Bugrova N.V. Fenomen «seti» v sovremennom nauchno-pedagogicheskom znanii [Elektronnyy resurs] // Zhurnal «Upravlenie shkoloy». – Rezhim dostupa: http://upr.1september.ru/view_article.php?ID=200801812
2. Galanova O.A. Dialog kak kharakteristika vzaimodeystviya v regionalnyh obrazovatelnyh setyakh (iz opyta sozdaniya regionalnyh obrazovatelnyh setey v Avstrii) // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2012. – № 358. – S. 112-116.
3. Kryukov Yu.A. Edinaya informatsionno-obrazovatelnaya sety «Dubna» // Sistemnyy analiz v nauke i obrazovanii. – 2008. – № 2. – S. 10-15.
4. Kucheruk V.A. Formirovanie mezhfirmennyh setey: teoriya, metodologiya, instrumentariy // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. – 2011. – № 8. – S. 21-25.
5. Mendkovich A.S. Nauchno-obrazovatelnaya sety FreeNet: 10 let evolyutsii // Informatsionnoe obschestvo. – 2001. – № 5. – S. 4-8.
6. Obschestvo setevyh struktur: Monografiya / M.V. Romm, T.A. Romm, S.G. Proskurin [i dr.]. – Novosibirsk: Izdatelstvo NGTU, 2011. – 325 s.
7. Sokolova E.I. Termin «obrazovatelnyy klaster» v ponyatiynom pole sovremennoy pedagogiki // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. – 2014. – № 2.
8. Khoysling R. Sotsialnye protsessy kak setevye igry: sotsiologicheskoe esse po osnovnym aspektam setevoy teorii. – M. Logos-Altera, 2003. – 192 s.
9. Churekova T.M., Khamidulina N.A. Universitetskaya obrazovatelnaya sety – uslovie sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona // Fundamentalnye issledovaniya. – 2006. – № 9. – S. 67-69.
10. Chuchkevich M.M. Osnovy upravleniya setevymi organizatsiyami. – M.: Izdatelstvo Instituta sotsiologii, 1999. – 38 s.
11. Schennikov S., Kleva L. Distantsionnaya obrazovatelnaya sety // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. – 2005. – № 3. – S. 8-12.
12. Research and Development Expenditure [Electronic resource] // UNESCO UIS. – Mode of access: http://www.uis.unesco.org/
13. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ''Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations // Research Policy. – 2000. – Vol. 29. – P. 109-123.
14. Casson M. Information and Organisation. A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
15. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. – 857 p.