bgscience@idbg.ru
+7 495 648 62 41 Russia, 127015, Moscow, Novodmitrovskaya st. 5A (b. 7)
Menu

Switch to Russian:to Russian

Study of Intellectual Capital from a Perspective of Schools of Science of Western and Eastern Civilizations


Kirill Yaroshenko, Inga Tsygankova, Tatyyana Novikova
(about the authors)

Yaroshenko Kirill Nikolaevich – Postgraduate Student, Economy Faculty, Russian Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Tsygankova Inga Vladimirovna – Dr. of Econ. Sci., Professor, Chair of Management of Labor Social Processes, Saint-Petersburg State University of Engineering and Economics

Novikova Tatyyana Valeryevna – Cand. of Econ. Sci., Associate Professor, Chair of Economy and Labor Management, Omsk State Technical University

Published in:
Creative Economy
– № 12 / December, 2011



Keywords: conceptualization, economy, intellectual capital, knowledge, philosophy schools, theoretical approach, vision


Citation:
Kirill Yaroshenko, Inga Tsygankova, Tatyyana Novikova (2011). Study of Intellectual Capital from a Perspective of Schools of Science of Western and Eastern Civilizations. Creative Economy, 5(12), 96-101. — url: http://bgscience.ru/com/lib/726


Share:

Abstract:

Article represents difference between eastern and western cultures in approach to study and conceptualization of “knowledge” category. Understanding of consequences and changes in theory and practice in a field of intellectual capital on a global level is critically important. In practice of business dealing in Asia it is necessary to understand what results will be given by adaptation of western theories or development of own solutions, and what horizons and perspectives it will open.







References:
1. Ai Yu, Leif Edvinsson. Some Intellectual Capital (IC) perspectives from a Chinese point of view. Paper presented at 4th Asia Pacific International conference on Knowledge management, KMAP 2008, Guangzhou, China, December 11, 2008.
2. Daniel Andriessen, Marien van den Boom. Asia and Europe, knowledge economies in encounter. INA Magazine, Vol. XVIII no.4.
3. Daniel Andriessen, Marien van den Boom. Asian and western Intellectual Capital in encounter. IC-Congress 2007, INHOLLAND University of professional education, Haarlem, The Netherlands, 3-4 May 2007.
4. Eliade, M. (1992), «Neo-Confucianism». In Eliade, M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion, MacMillan Reference Books, New York.
5. Grant, R.M. (1996), «Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm», Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17.
6. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1994), Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
7. Linstone, H. A. and Zhu, Z. (2000), «Towards synergy in multiperspective management: An American-Chinese case», Human Systems Management, Vol.19.
8. Nonaka, I. (1994), «A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation», Organization Science, Vol.5.
9. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.
10. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., and Konno, N. (2001), “SECI, Ba and leadershi: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation”, in Nonaka, I. and Teece, D. (Eds.), Managing Industrial Knowledge. Creation,Transfer and Utilization, SAGE Publications, London.
11. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), «The Core Competence of the Corporation», Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68.
12. Zhu, Z. (2004), «Knowledge management: towards a universal concept or cross-cultural contexts?», Knowledge Management Research and Practice, Vol. 2.