Modern trends in the company lifecycle theory development
Зябриков В.В.1, Шевазуцкий И.Р.1
1 Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет
Download PDF | Downloads: 8
Journal paper
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship *
Volume 19, Number 9 (September 2018)
* Этот журнал не выпускается в Первом экономическом издательстве
Please, cite as:
Zyabrikov V.V., Shevazutskiy I.R. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya teorii zhiznennogo tsikla firmy // Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. – 2018. – Tom 19. – № 9. – S. 2581-2592. – doi: 10.18334/rp.19.9.39306.
Abstract:
Business culture, along with the strategy, is an important element of the internal environment of the company, a factor in its success, determines the degree of maturity of its management and staff. This Central element of the internal environment of the company most accurately characterizes the mechanism of management decision-making in the company, and therefore to a greater extent than the strategy or structure determines the actual level of development of the company, and hence the stage of its life cycle.
It should be noted that the future strategy reflects not the actual state of the company, but only the expectations and intentions of its management. The strategy can be chosen correctly or incorrectly, this in itself does not change the stage of the life cycle of the company, because the strategy is not suitable for determining the stage of the life cycle. On the contrary, the organizational structure is usually late in relation to the achieved level of development of the firm. The article shows that the sequence of successive types of business culture most accurately characterizes the dynamics of changes in the internal environment of the company, and therefore the type of culture is a suitable identifier of the stage of its life cycle of the company.
Keywords: life cycle, life cycle stage definition, culture typology
JEL-classification: M14, D23, D21, D22
References:
Filonovich S.R. (2005). Ispolzovanie modeley zhiznennogo tsikla v organizatsionnoy diagnostike [Using life-cycle models in organizational diagnostics]. Sociological Studies (Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia). (4). 53-64. (in Russian).
Hanks Steven H., Watson Collin J., Jansen Erik, Chandler Gaylen N. (1993). Tightening the life-cycle construct: a taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high-technology organizations Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 18 (2). 5-30.
Leithy W.E. Organizational culture and organizational life cycleInternational journal of economics and management sciences. Retrieved from https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/organizational-culture-and-organizational-life-cycle-2162-6359-1000433.pdf
Miller D., Friesen P.H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle Management science. 30 (10). 1161-1183.
Pumpin C., Prange J. (1991). Management der unternehmensentwicklung: phasengerichte fuhrung und der umgang mit krisen Frankfurt a.M: Campus.
Rahimi F., Fallah S. (2015). Study of organizational life cycle and its impact on strategy formulation Procedia – Social and behavioral sciences. (207). 50-58.
Shirokova G.V. (2008). Zhiznennyy tsikl organizatsii: kontseptsii i rossiyskaya praktika [Life cycle of the organization: concepts and russian practice] SPb.: Izdat. dom S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta. (in Russian).
Ul Hassan F. S. (2011). Exploring the relationships among organizational life cycle stages and different traits of organizational culture Business and management review. 1 103-112.
Zyabrikov V.V., Akhvlediani Z.Dzh. (2016). Edinaya tipologiya delovoy kultury i protsess formirovaniya kultury firmy [Single typology of the business culture and the process of formation of the company''s culture]. Creative economy. 10 (8). 883-904. (in Russian).
Zyabrikova A.V., Zyabrikov V.V. (2014). Optimalnaya traektoriya zhiznennogo tsikla firmy [Optimal trajectory of the company lifecycle (Russia, Saint-Petersburg)]. Problems of modern economics. (4). 123-127. (in Russian).
Страница обновлена: 04.05.2024 в 03:04:02