Accumulation and realization of human capital in new conditions: opportunities and limitations

Федорова О.И.¹, Зуева Е.Г.¹
¹ Оренбургский Государственный Университет, Russia

Download PDF | Downloads: 10 | Citations: 12

Journal paper

^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 12, Number 10 (October 2018)

Please, cite as:
Fedorova O.I., Zueva E.G. Nakoplenie i realizatsiya chelovecheskogo kapitala v novyh usloviyakh: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya // Kreativnaya ekonomika. – 2018. – Tom 12. – № 10. – S. 1649-1660. – doi: 10.18334/ce.12.10.39434.

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36455312
Cited: 12 by 07.08.2023

Abstract:
The article aims to characterize the possibilities and limitations of accumulation and realization of human capital in the conditions of deep penetration of new technologies in economic activity. Despite the fact that information and economic activities related to its production and processing have become important factors of socio-economic development, the labour force continues to be the leading element in this process. In Russia, the move towards digitalization of economic processes coincided with the ongoing transformation of the economy in accordance with the principles of the market system of management, which significantly complicates the task of following the trend of development of the world economy. But despite the objective difficulties, the natural result of the renewal of all aspects of society as a result of the development of the digital economy (or a new technological structure) differs from the industrial economy segmentation of the labor market and the formation of post-industrial type of employee.

Keywords: human capital, labour market, digital economy

JEL-classification: J24, J21, J20

References:

Anikin V.A. (2018). Chelovecheskiy kapital v post-krizisnoy Rossii: sostoyanie i otdacha [Human Capital in Post-Crisis Russia: Status and Impact]. Journal of Institutional Studies. 10 (2). 90-117. (in Russian). doi: 10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.2.090-117.
Buzgalin A., Kolganov A. (2006). Chelovek, rynok i kapital v ekonomike XXI veka [Man, market and capital in the economy of the XXI century]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. (3). 125-141. (in Russian).
Galazova S.S. (2016). Kreativnaya sfera: problemy rynochnoy transformatsii [Creative industries: problems of market transformation]. Terra Economicus. 14 (4). 31-41. (in Russian). doi: 10.18522/2073-6606-2016-14-4-31-41.
Gogacheva O.V. (2012). Novoe kachestvo ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy v innovatsionnom proizvodstve kak uslovie maksimizatsii individualnogo blagosostoyaniya [New quality of economic relations in innovative production as a condition of maximizing individual welfare]. Economic sciences. (9). 24-27. (in Russian).
Goncharenko V.M., Shapoval A.B. (2018). Vliyanie struktury sprosa i razmera rynka na bezrabotitsu, neravenstvo dokhodov i obschestvennoe blagosostoyanie [Impact of Demand Structure and Market Size on Unemployment, Income Inequality and Social Welfare]. The Journal of the New Economic Association. (1(37)). 12-33. (in Russian).
Grinenko S.V., Zadorozhnaya E.K., Naydenko I.S. (2017). Imperativy gendernogo ravenstva v vosproizvodstve chelovecheskogo kapitala na regionalnom urovne [The imperative of gender equality in the reproduction of human capital at the regional level]. Terra Economicus. 15 (4). 64-78. (in Russian). doi: 10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-4-64-78.
Karavay A.V. (2017). Sostoyanie i dinamika kachestva chelovecheskogo kapitala rossiyskikh rabochikh [State and dynamics of the quality of the Russian workers'' human capital]. Terra Economicus. 15 (3). 144-158. (in Russian). doi: 10.23683/2073-66-6-2017-15-3-144-158.
Karavay A.V. (2018). Sravnitelnaya rol institutsionalnyh faktorov i askriptivnyh kharakteristik v opredelenii kachestva chelovecheskogo kapitala rossiyskikh rabochikh [Comparative Role of Institutional Factors and Ascriptive Characteristics in Determining the Quality of Human Capital of Russian Workers]. Journal of Institutional Studies. 10 (2). 59-71. (in Russian). doi: 10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.2.059-071.
Kravchenko N.A., Ageeva S.D. (2017). Diversifikatsiya ekonomiki: institutsionalnye aspekty [Diversification of the Economy: Institutional Aspects]. Journal of Institutional Studies. 9 (4). 52-67. (in Russian). doi: 10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.4.052-067.
Kudryavtseva E.I. (2018). Kompaniya kak potrebitel intellektualnogo potentsiala rabotnika [Company as consumer of intellectual potential of employees]. Vestnik fakulteta upravleniya spbgeu. (3). 145-149. (in Russian).
Latova N.V. (2018). Chelovecheskiy potentsial rossiyskikh rabochikh: tsennosti i ustanovki [The Human Potential Of Russian Workers: Values And Attitudes]. Journal of Institutional Studies. (2). 44-58. (in Russian). doi: 10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.2.044-058.
Orudzheva A.A. (2011). Metodologiya issledovaniya trudovogo potentsiala [Methodology of labour potential research]. Economic sciences. (12). 200-204. (in Russian).
Sakharovskiy S.N. (2012). Institutsionalnye faktory formirovaniya chelovecheskogo potentsiala [Institutional factors of human potential foundation]. Journal of Institutional Studies. 4 (2). 83-92. (in Russian).
Tagarov B.Zh., Tagarov Zh.Z. (2018). Osobennosti informatsionnogo neravenstva v sovremennoy ekonomike [Specific features of an information inequality in a modern economy]. Creative economy. 12 (5). 543-554. (in Russian). doi: 10.18334/ce.12.5.39106.
Trunkina L.V., Krumina K.V. (2012). Upravlenie trudovym potentsialom: informatsionno-kommunikatsionnyy aspekt [Labor Capacity Management: Informative-Communicative Aspect]. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. (17(115)). 72-77. (in Russian).
Tsirel S.V. (2017). Ekonomika blizhayshego buduschego [The economy of the nearest future]. Terra Economicus. 15 (1). 44-67. (in Russian). doi: 10.18522/2073-6606-2017-15-1-44-6.
Женщины и мужчины РоссииФедеральная служба государственной статистики. (in Russian). Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b16_50/Main.htm

Страница обновлена: 22.05.2024 в 11:00:15

Подробнее об авторах: