Human capital in a general knowledge system

Сухарев М.В.¹
¹ Карельский научный центр РАН, Петрозаводск

Download PDF | Downloads: 10 | Citations: 11

Journal paper

^{(РИНЦ, ВАК)}
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 11, Number 9 (September 2017)

Please, cite as:
Sukharev M.V. Chelovecheskiy kapital v obshchey sisteme znaniy // Kreativnaya ekonomika. – 2017. – Tom 11. – № 9. – S. 915-930. – doi: 10.18334/ce.11.9.38353.

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30737181
Cited: 11 by 24.01.2023

Abstract:
The article is devoted to the analysis of interaction between human capital (as that terms is used in modern economic science) and various types of human knowledge identified in the economy as various types of intangible capital such cultural capital, intellectual capital and a number of others capitals. We also study interactions between these types of capital (knowledge), including the creation of knowledge. The research methodology includes a comparative literature review and systemic, structural approaches, including analysis and comparison of the structure of intangible capital types and their interactions in the process of human capital formation, theoretical analysis and systematization. Human capital is formed through assimilation by an individual of various types of knowledge (intangible capital): cultural, social, organizational, etc. The results of the study reveal the existing inconsistency in the definitions of various types of intangible capital. The obtained results can be used to develop a systematic theory of human capital reproduction in the context of intangible capital and its role in economic development. The sum of all knowledge, skills, competencies and information available to humanity forms the intangible capital of mankind (noosphere). There is a constant process of movement of this capital in the form of its internalization by individuals and organizations, and in the form of creation by individuals of new knowledge, information, organizational forms and artistic values. The study of the structure of intangible capital reproduction provides grounds for the classification of its species, including human capital.

Keywords: human capital, information, knowledge, noosphere, intangible capital

JEL-classification: J24, E24, D80

References:

Belyaeva L.A. (2014). Nematerialnyy kapital: k metodologii issledovaniya [Non-material capital: on the research methodology]. Sociological research. (1). 36-44. (in Russian).
Bochkaeva I.V. (2011). Vzaimodeystvie sotsialnogo i chelovecheskogo kapitala organizatsii [Interaction of organization's social and human capital ]. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 31 (6). 142-147. (in Russian).
Bourdieu P. (1986). The forms of capital NY.
Corrado C. et. al. (2012). Intangible capital and growth in advanced economies: Measurement and comparative results Great Britain: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Hermans J., Lederer T. The paradox of social capital: a look through the individual rationalityCRECIS Working Paper 09/23. Retrieved from https://www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/iag/documents/WP_23_Hermans_Lederer.pdf
Hutchins E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild Cambridge: MIT Press.
Keeley B. (2007). Human Capital: How what you know shapes your life Paris: OECD.
Khantington S. (2003). Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy [The Clash of civilizations] Moscow: Izdatelstvo AST. (in Russian).
Koulman Dzh. (2001). Kapital sotsialnyy i chelovecheskiy [Social and human capital]. Modernity (social sciences). (3). 121-139. (in Russian).
Luman N.L. (2004). Obschestvo kak sotsialnaya sistema [Society as a social system] Moscow: Logos. (in Russian).
Melnikov O.N. (2013). Cluchayno li nastuplenie epokhi kreativnoy ekonomiki? [Is an Advent of a Creative Economy Accidental?]. Creative economy. 7 (2). 118-126. (in Russian).
Nahapiet J. Ghoshal S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage The Academy of Management Review. 23 (2). 242-266.
Pasetta V. (2005). Modeling Foundations of Economic Property Rights Theory: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Agreements Berlin: Springer.
Poddyakov A.N. (2012). Matritsy igr chelovecheskogo metakapitala: igry na povyshenie i ponizhenie stolyarov, grabiteley i professorov [Matrices of Human Metacapital Games: Up and Down Games for Woodman, Robber, and Professor]. Economic sociology. 13 (3). 71-95. (in Russian).
Radaev V.V. (2002). Ponyatie kapitala, formy kapitalov i ikh konvertatsiya [The concept of capital, forms of capital and their conversion]. Economic sociology. 3 (4). 20-32. (in Russian).
Rodionova I.A., Kokuytseva T.V., Galkin M.A. (2013). Raskhody na nauchnye issledovaniya i liderstvo stran v proizvodstve i eksporte vysokotekhnologichnyh tovarov v XXI veke: mir i Rossiya [Expenses on scientific researches and leadership of the countries in production and export of hi-tech goods in the xxi century: world and russia]. ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika. (3). 41-56. (in Russian).
Rothstein B., Stolle D. (2008). Political institutions and generalized trust New York.
Sukharev M.V. (2008). Evolyutsionnoe upravlenie sotsialno-ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Evolutionary management of socio-economic systems] Petrozavodsk: KarNTs RAN. (in Russian).
Tzanakis M. (2013). Social capital in Bourdieu’s, Coleman’s and Putnam’s theory: empirical evidence and emergent measurement issues Educate. 13 (2). 2-23.
Yagupa E.G. (2011). Identifikatsiya, formalizatsiya i otsenka nematerialnogo kapitala regiona [Identification, formalization and evaluation of intangible capital in the region]. Transport business in Russia. (2). 34-37. (in Russian).
de Pleijt A.M. The Role of Human Capital in the Process of Economic Development: The Case of England, 1307-1900CGEH Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.cgeh.nl/working-paper-series/

Страница обновлена: 14.05.2024 в 12:48:03

Подробнее об авторе: