Artem BolshakovPublished in:
Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship
– Volume 17, Number 4 (February, 2016)



Keywords: cluster, competitiveness, competitiveness pole, development, region, regional economy


Share:

Abstract:

The subject of this research is related to the necessity to decrease the use of nature resources as a definitive competitive advantage and search for new ways to increase the aggregated competitive potential of the countries and regions. The innovational approach to regional development that is based on the achievement of science and engineering is nowadays used with increasing frequency. In this connection, the role of clusters and competitiveness pole increases in the modern world. The goal of this research is to compare the main characteristics of cluster and competitiveness pole and to reveal their influence on the regions’ competitive development. To achieve the above goal, it is necessary to solve the following tasks: to discuss cluster and competitiveness poles, to reveal their characteristics; to perform a comparative analysis of cluster and competitiveness pole; to reveal the influence of cluster and competitiveness pole on the region’s competitive development; to propose certain measures as for the support of cluster and competitiveness pole development. Based on the existing domestic and foreign experience (including practical experience) the author has considered cluster» and competitiveness pole from the perspective of their influence on the region’s competitiveness. Certain measures have been proposed as for the support of the competitiveness poles development. The research results may be used for a more in-depth understanding of the role of cluster and competitiveness pole in promising development of the regions and also to take measures necessary to support this development.

---

References:
1. Porter M. Konkurentsiya. – M.: Vilyams, 2005. – 608 s.
2. Chernoutsan E.M. Polyusa konkurentosposobnosti kak vazhneyshiy instrument realizatsii novogo kursa promyshlennoy i regionalnoy politiki Frantsii // Problemy gosudarstvennoy politiki regionalnogo razvitiya Rossii: Sbornik materialov konferentsii. – M.: Tsentr problemnogo analiza i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskogo proektirovaniya, 2008. – 1080 s. – S. 861-866.
3. Animitsa E.G., Dvoryadkina E.B. Promyshlennaya politika i modeli regionalnogo razvitiya // Promyshlennaya politika v strategii rossiyskikh modernizatsiy XVIII—XXI vv.: Sbornik materialov konferentsii. – Ekaterinburg: Institut istorii i arkheologii UrO RAN, 2006. – 432 s. – S. 299–303.
4. Animitsa E.G. Regionalnoe upravlenie: Kurs lektsiy. – Ekaterinburg: UrGEU, 2010. – 340 s.
5. Animitsa E.G. Kharakter vzaimodeystviya modernizatsii i regionalnogo razvitiya // Materialy I Vserossiyskogo simpoziuma po regionalnoy ekonomike: Doklady sektsionnyh zasedaniy. V 2 t. T. 1. – Ekaterinburg: IE UrO RAN, 2011. – S. 13–15.
6. Afanasyev M., Myasnikova L. Mirovaya konkurentsiya i klasterizatsiya ekonomiki // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2005. – № 4. – S. 75-86.
7. Granberg A.G. Osnovy regionalnoy ekonomiki: Uchebnik. – 3-e izd. – M.: GU VShE, 2003. – 495 s.
8. Romanova O.A., Ogloblin A.A., Lavrikova Yu.G. Kontseptsiya sozdaniya vysokotekhnologichnogo klastera «Titanovaya dolina». – Ekaterinburg: IE UrO RAN, 2008. – 118 s.
9. Lavrikova Yu.G. Klastery kak rynochnyy institut prostranstvennogo razvitiya ekonomiki regiona: Dis. ... d-ra ekon. nauk: 08.00.05. – Ekaterinburg, 2009. – 358 s.
10. Marshall A. Printsipy ekonomicheskoy nauki: v 3 t. – M.: Progress, 1993.
11. Marshall A. Printsipy politicheskoy ekonomii. V 3 t. T. 1. – M.: Progress, 1983. – 416 s.
12. Pilipenko I.V. Regionalnaya model geoekonomicheskoy strategii povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti Rossii: perspektivy razvitiya regionalnyh innovatsionnyh sistem v Tomskoy i Novosibirskoy oblastyakh // Bezopasnosty Evrazii. – 2005. – № 2. – S. 418-430.
13. Regionalnaya ekonomika: Uchebnik. – M.: INFA-M, 2007. – 666 s.
14. Regionalnaya ekonomika i regionalnaya politika: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. – Ekaterinburg: UrGEU, 2004. – Vyp. 7. – 151 s.
15. Kontseptsiya sozdaniya Uralskogo avtomobilnogo klastera / O.A. Romanova, Yu.G. Lavrikova, P.F. Chernavin [i dr.]. – Ekaterinburg: IE UrO RAN, 2008. – 107 s.
16. Strukturnaya transformatsiya ekonomiki gorodov staropromyshlennogo regiona / E.G. Animitsa, N.Yu. Vlasova, E.B. Dvoryadkina [i dr.]. – Ekaterinburg: UrGEU, 2001. – 140 s.
17. Tatarkin A.I. Innovatsionnoe razvitie Rossii: ot politicheskikh prizyvov k antikrizisnym deystviyam // Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment. – 2010. – № 20. – S. 68-74.
18. Tatarkin A.I., Obukhov A.Yu., Makarova I.V. Antikrizisnaya politika staropromyshlennogo regiona // Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 56-63.
19. Enright M.J. Why Clusters are the Way to Win the Game? // World Link. – 1992. – № 5. – P. 24-25.
20. Ketels C. European Clusters // Structural Change in Europe 3 – Innovative City and Business Regions. – Bollschweil: Hagbarth Publications, 2003. – P. 148–159.